From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: =?utf-8?Q?=C3=93scar_Fuentes?= Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Emacs contributions, C and Lisp Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2014 22:15:37 +0100 Message-ID: <877g8gcl52.fsf@wanadoo.es> References: <53064BD0.7070009@yandex.ru> <87ha7tr5bo.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <87ppmhecd8.fsf@yandex.ru> <87y50z90pd.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <87txbn8r6x.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <8338j717oe.fsf@gnu.org> <87zjlf6tdx.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <83sir7yue7.fsf@gnu.org> <8761o3dlak.fsf@wanadoo.es> <83bnxuzyl4.fsf@gnu.org> <871tyqes5q.fsf@wanadoo.es> <834n3lzux6.fsf@gnu.org> <87ppm9d3y4.fsf@wanadoo.es> <83ob1ty4qr.fsf@gnu.org> <87ha7lcxki.fsf@wanadoo.es> <83ios0xwcv.fsf@gnu.org> <87bnxscr0x.fsf@wanadoo.es> <83eh2oxpnw.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1393535767 27677 80.91.229.3 (27 Feb 2014 21:16:07 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 27 Feb 2014 21:16:07 +0000 (UTC) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Feb 27 22:16:14 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1WJ8JR-0004ez-Rz for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 27 Feb 2014 22:16:13 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:48033 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WJ8JR-0001Q8-Bn for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 27 Feb 2014 16:16:13 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:53535) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WJ8JI-0001Pg-SM for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 27 Feb 2014 16:16:10 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WJ8JD-0000B8-0M for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 27 Feb 2014 16:16:04 -0500 Original-Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:57043) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WJ8JC-0000Az-Py for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 27 Feb 2014 16:15:58 -0500 Original-Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1WJ8J2-0003Cr-Dz for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 27 Feb 2014 22:15:48 +0100 Original-Received: from 19.red-83-39-162.dynamicip.rima-tde.net ([83.39.162.19]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 27 Feb 2014 22:15:48 +0100 Original-Received: from ofv by 19.red-83-39-162.dynamicip.rima-tde.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Thu, 27 Feb 2014 22:15:48 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-Lines: 24 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 19.red-83-39-162.dynamicip.rima-tde.net User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:ZCncirZk5djEJgEGIlfl5c2Z8t4= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 80.91.229.3 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:169915 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii writes: > What happened to the other one? It is still in the source. Smart completion is all about showing the appropriate completions for the context where the point is. Once you know the number and type of arguments, if you have zero or more than one acceptable overloads, the code is malformed. Barred that, there is one and only one correct overload, which is the one the compiler will use. A correct smart code completion system will show precisely that overload. That's what a C++ programmer expects, and then I'm perplexed when I read this: [snip] >> Eli, are you a C++ programmer? Do you code in C++ on a regular basis? > > Yes! It is obvious then that we have here a complete miscomunication, so I'll stop the discussion here. [snip]