From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: David Kastrup Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Redisplay problems? Date: Mon, 24 Mar 2014 09:32:20 +0100 Organization: Organization?!? Message-ID: <877g7kxai3.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> References: <87ppljg4ti.fsf@kanru-mozilla.corp.tpe1.mozilla.com> <5329C53B.3030008@gmx.at> <532ABA60.7000003@gmx.at> <83siqc7n87.fsf@gnu.org> <83a9ck6lzf.fsf@gnu.org> <83eh1v5y53.fsf@gnu.org> <83y5024r1w.fsf@gnu.org> <83ior6489a.fsf@gnu.org> <834n2q43os.fsf@gnu.org> <83vbv62gr7.fsf@gnu.org> <83txao1c8n.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1395649961 8061 80.91.229.3 (24 Mar 2014 08:32:41 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 24 Mar 2014 08:32:41 +0000 (UTC) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Mar 24 09:32:50 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1WS0JO-0000GV-1i for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 24 Mar 2014 09:32:50 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:34969 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WS0JN-0005cs-Is for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 24 Mar 2014 04:32:49 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:53908) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WS0JH-0005ch-4M for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 24 Mar 2014 04:32:47 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WS0JB-0008Ku-Dt for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 24 Mar 2014 04:32:43 -0400 Original-Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:54229) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WS0JB-0008Kg-77 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 24 Mar 2014 04:32:37 -0400 Original-Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1WS0J5-0008MG-12 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 24 Mar 2014 09:32:31 +0100 Original-Received: from x2f3f0e4.dyn.telefonica.de ([2.243.240.228]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 24 Mar 2014 09:32:31 +0100 Original-Received: from dak by x2f3f0e4.dyn.telefonica.de with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Mon, 24 Mar 2014 09:32:31 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-Lines: 25 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: x2f3f0e4.dyn.telefonica.de X-Face: 2FEFf>]>q>2iw=B6, xrUubRI>pR&Ml9=ao@P@i)L:\urd*t9M~y1^:+Y]'C0~{mAl`oQuAl \!3KEIp?*w`|bL5qr,H)LFO6Q=qx~iH4DN; i"; /yuIsqbLLCh/!U#X[S~(5eZ41to5f%E@'ELIi$t^ Vc\LWP@J5p^rst0+('>Er0=^1{]M9!p?&:\z]|;&=NP3AhB!B_bi^]Pfkw User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.4.50 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:5ZJqUyx5wg5znksQ9OdL8IS8Eto= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 80.91.229.3 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:170903 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii writes: >> From: Stefan >> Cc: rudalics@gmx.at, christian@defun.dk, kanru@kanru.info, cloos@jhcloos.com, >> emacs-devel@gnu.org >> Date: Sun, 23 Mar 2014 21:58:32 -0400 >> >> > I actually don't think we should be bothered about this at all. Why >> > does it make sense to optimize the use case where a frame is >> > deiconified? >> >> If you have 50 frames, 25 on one desktop and 25 on the other, whenever >> you switch from one desktop to the other, 25 frames get deiconified and >> the other 25 get iconified. > > I still don't see anything performance critical even in this scenario. > A switch to a different desktop is not something one would do several > times a second, and it's okay for it to take a second or so. It is quite customary to _cycle_ through desktops and go through several in fast succession until finding the desired one. Most certainly at a rate of several (three or four) per second. -- David Kastrup