From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: David Kastrup Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Dynamic loading progress Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2015 06:35:57 +0200 Message-ID: <877fokq91u.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> References: <54E24CA4.9020601@dancol.org> <83h9uk7ddb.fsf@gnu.org> <54E382A5.5030408@dancol.org> <54F789B2.6030105@dancol.org> <87egnel6ac.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87vbgpk1po.fsf@lifelogs.com> <85mw20gmeo.fsf@stephe-leake.org> <878u97nyjn.fsf@lifelogs.com> <86d1yirnqw.fsf@stephe-leake.org> <87si7977rs.fsf@tromey.com> <55DB7C3D.4090106@cs.ucla.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1440477494 8186 80.91.229.3 (25 Aug 2015 04:38:14 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 25 Aug 2015 04:38:14 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Daniel Colascione , Emacs development discussions , Stefan Monnier , =?iso-8859-1?Q?Aur=E9lien?= Aptel , Tom Tromey , Stephen Leake To: Paul Eggert Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Aug 25 06:38:13 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1ZU5zw-0002L4-BE for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 25 Aug 2015 06:38:12 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:57968 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZU5zv-0001Tk-Na for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 25 Aug 2015 00:38:11 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:60176) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZU5zV-0001Q5-AR for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 25 Aug 2015 00:37:45 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZU5zU-0008Hr-FD for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 25 Aug 2015 00:37:45 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:34261) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZU5zI-0008D4-D7; Tue, 25 Aug 2015 00:37:32 -0400 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:48076 helo=lola) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1ZU5zH-0003Ox-5Z; Tue, 25 Aug 2015 00:37:31 -0400 Original-Received: by lola (Postfix, from userid 1000) id D768ADF652; Tue, 25 Aug 2015 06:35:57 +0200 (CEST) In-Reply-To: <55DB7C3D.4090106@cs.ucla.edu> (Paul Eggert's message of "Mon, 24 Aug 2015 13:19:09 -0700") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: Malformed IPv6 address (bad octet value). X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:189141 Archived-At: Paul Eggert writes: > On 08/24/2015 12:13 PM, Stefan Monnier wrote: >> IIUC there are still some situations where we build without conservative >> stack scanning. >> >> We should probably go and enable it everywhere. > > We did that last year, before 24.4 came out. GC_MARK_STACK is defined > to be GC_MAKE_GCPROS_NOOPS unless the builder compiles with > -DGC_MARK_STACK=somethingelse. I think nobody does that except > perhaps when testing. > >> If noone complains that >> should indicate that indeed conservative stack scanning is used (or ca >> be used) everywhere, so we could drop the GCPROs. > > As far as I know, nobody has complained, so we could drop the GCPROs > now if you like. > > Perhaps we should hold a wake? Should I bring a bottle of poteen? Just have people point at each other, that should keep them awake. -- David Kastrup