From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Michael Albinus Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Seeking a "Patch Champion" Date: Tue, 03 May 2016 09:58:57 +0200 Message-ID: <877ffbo9mm.fsf@gmx.de> References: <571F0B6C.8050003@online.de> <87mvo83ndx.fsf@petton.fr> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1462262399 8229 80.91.229.3 (3 May 2016 07:59:59 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 3 May 2016 07:59:59 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen , Andreas =?utf-8?Q?R=C3=B6hler?= , Nicolas Petton , Dmitry Gutov To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue May 03 09:59:52 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1axVFH-0002eT-G0 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 03 May 2016 09:59:51 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:40199 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1axVFD-00012n-TB for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 03 May 2016 03:59:47 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:44529) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1axVEu-0000sU-21 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 03 May 2016 03:59:34 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1axVEi-00013s-Cl for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 03 May 2016 03:59:22 -0400 Original-Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.15.15]:51872) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1axVEi-00010o-3H for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 03 May 2016 03:59:16 -0400 Original-Received: from detlef.gmx.de ([93.209.64.88]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx002) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0LvVUR-1bgQYS1PMp-010fqc; Tue, 03 May 2016 09:58:59 +0200 In-Reply-To: (John Wiegley's message of "Mon, 02 May 2016 13:55:26 -0700") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.1.50 (gnu/linux) X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:LNAueh1Y6enNLEhFB4Az0Z9vCUF2KWTGlnDTqYhdBWCz/TlobUA Enla7A6l1CuI+ZKVdlMgQ3jrt2HunfpL6TjO6YlOez2pJn2NKKNdVeAOzL9pNg1E+8/APx8 de2vayEuJQGOXi7Rm45EFl4YuuNgxCj2WH/C7ls/5j3aGitdl5KefMF5KTFfnaXf/ceWliZ FmW0skFBQHqySH9rKT+Vg== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:/zd4EtZvIeg=:PZ3V4kqNiBseo5wtt/4/II 82naEOzYXTgiYmISMPngIBVeLY2ePUvHbMpBUBtxWlJBh7VUsCVuzFeYKF3h0A6X8ATg7Qf5w 4WdKHeepO/2cyxRVaci+tIQ+GsyeTmYWOgrWbN2+Fxso6ihSN5Sk7nHx8fGymMMg7R8BzsmKh qYWtKhNO3cM4gGID1WbowWyNPMbH46uFC/gprYKnx0qSl9ye+65NNAPw8GtZSaX49SH0kc51p U9R5wvbwdhL9MrYIXPe23OyhwcX/xL/ATaUO5KA4y2icniy+X2VbPu6Ab288lKTlMjXCMlKyB /58R603sp5bIYAp0ysJLpll0vys0IP5twHS9bbzeTI2EjLmp4XB9VGp2rb7FVJir3HyZQzSoG mGhL5TJ2VVRwbX6gerH4ZNREgKhCTi2ijha8Urk9x7+Z8F8z1xvj4dfaB/dJXuq0t4vuVsT6/ jkUPwAuWg4wccVgwUhIBvCmAjGir7RBqe4aOodIf3DvhdbnOOtE731vchVirWBriCeKrCgV61 IswDNfLr2r4vP92e9YYRsOPOVNSLjuEgCwXd3wfA0Ki6UwgMIXiTzRbyc7Ks0V+O+zqQ+kVWh yhNm3akhcP5aLtLlWxXp18Roh26AuLDdGByizhUtgZlwTR58v/u1fPS/Yq2jrGCYAqJgpn+e4 uaztK01e6ox2LX+n+3mhx4+Mj+kpFYUHPZVFJnwZcsOaZlfY3lQh1Zih/mHW3WyQCIEnXdRAh wzXLzZm+ZPVwLBJ7alFQN/foQa+3ku9vHm/aIaw4pjIEiSvM7zBp0KGi67OkZg+4VNVAcJwM X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 212.227.15.15 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:203539 Archived-At: John Wiegley writes: > Lars, can you extend debbugs to scan for patches that aren't mentioned by > having [PATCH] in the subject line, both for attachments and for inline > patches? M-x debbugs-gnu-search [RX] ^@@ package emacs This returns you all Emacs bugs which have message containing a patch line starting with "@@". Unfortunately, it returns *all* bugs, even the closed and/or archived ones (2789 as of today). This is unfortune. You could filter out the closed bugs by typing "x" (351 bugs are left), but this is bad wrt performance and load on the debbugs server. The debbugs interface offers also the attribute "status" with the value "open", which should discriminate the results to still active bugs. That doesn't seem to work. Will investigate what's up. If the interactive command shown above looks useful, I could provide a function doing the same. Best regards, Michael.