From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Andreas Schwab Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: libnettle/libhogweed WIP Date: Sat, 03 Jun 2017 12:09:17 +0200 Message-ID: <877f0te62a.fsf@linux-m68k.org> References: <83h91og80k.fsf@gnu.org> <87pogbuhoe.fsf@lifelogs.com> <834lxndmd9.fsf@gnu.org> <87efwrug6z.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87r30qu5av.fsf@lifelogs.com> <874lxmtxyy.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87r30prvwt.fsf@lifelogs.com> <8337d4csez.fsf@gnu.org> <87r30nq9el.fsf@lifelogs.com> <83inlyc1k2.fsf@gnu.org> <87inlyrfni.fsf@lifelogs.com> <837f2eb845.fsf@gnu.org> <87ziedpyy1.fsf@lifelogs.com> <83d1b75u8a.fsf@gnu.org> <87r2znntaq.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87o9u8q4a5.fsf@lifelogs.com> <83tw3xbklg.fsf@gnu.org> <83mv9pbdb0.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1496484575 10482 195.159.176.226 (3 Jun 2017 10:09:35 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 3 Jun 2017 10:09:35 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.2 (gnu/linux) Cc: tzz@lifelogs.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Jun 03 12:09:31 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1dH5zu-0002Qr-6G for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 03 Jun 2017 12:09:30 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:53139 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dH5zx-0004wy-IA for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 03 Jun 2017 06:09:33 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:37986) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dH5zq-0004wp-Ns for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 03 Jun 2017 06:09:27 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dH5zp-0005P6-Rz for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 03 Jun 2017 06:09:26 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-out.m-online.net ([212.18.0.9]:54829) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1dH5zl-0005O3-35; Sat, 03 Jun 2017 06:09:21 -0400 Original-Received: from frontend01.mail.m-online.net (unknown [192.168.8.182]) by mail-out.m-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3wfxdC1rRCz1qsD6; Sat, 3 Jun 2017 12:09:19 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from localhost (dynscan1.mnet-online.de [192.168.6.70]) by mail.m-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3wfxdB6tmdz3jgXr; Sat, 3 Jun 2017 12:09:18 +0200 (CEST) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mnet-online.de Original-Received: from mail.mnet-online.de ([192.168.8.182]) by localhost (dynscan1.mail.m-online.net [192.168.6.70]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id N-Q9oWQ9sBva; Sat, 3 Jun 2017 12:09:18 +0200 (CEST) X-Auth-Info: y+C7QmQvAxPdpHmdhL9uTNmbBZHshqlM9Men0kH3wHQX1EoP+UDsrAcdYQl/ARyZ Original-Received: from igel.home (ppp-88-217-4-89.dynamic.mnet-online.de [88.217.4.89]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.mnet-online.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA; Sat, 3 Jun 2017 12:09:18 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: by igel.home (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 90B542C3B96; Sat, 3 Jun 2017 12:09:17 +0200 (CEST) X-Yow: FUN is never having to say you're SUSHI!! In-Reply-To: <83mv9pbdb0.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Sat, 03 Jun 2017 13:01:07 +0300") X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 212.18.0.9 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:215429 Archived-At: On Jun 03 2017, Eli Zaretskii wrote: >> From: Andreas Schwab >> Cc: Ted Zlatanov , emacs-devel@gnu.org >> Date: Sat, 03 Jun 2017 11:00:16 +0200 >> >> On Jun 03 2017, Eli Zaretskii wrote: >> >> > + Lisp_Object object = Fnth (make_number (0), spec); >> > + Lisp_Object start = Fnth (make_number (1), spec); >> > + Lisp_Object end = Fnth (make_number (2), spec); >> > + Lisp_Object coding_system = Fnth (make_number (3), spec); >> > + Lisp_Object noerror = Fnth (make_number (4), spec); >> > >> > Isn't it simpler to use XCAR and XCDR here? >> >> Wouldn't it be even simpler to just pass each argument separately? > > Maybe it would, but given the amount of procrastination about the form > of the arguments to these function, I'm not sure we want to re-argue > all that again. I don't understand. This is just an internal helper function. Andreas. -- Andreas Schwab, schwab@linux-m68k.org GPG Key fingerprint = 58CA 54C7 6D53 942B 1756 01D3 44D5 214B 8276 4ED5 "And now for something completely different."