From: Mark Oteiza <mvoteiza@udel.edu>
To: Marcin Borkowski <mbork@mbork.pl>
Cc: jwiegley@gmail.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org,
"João Távora" <joaotavora@gmail.com>,
dgutov@yandex.ru, sdl.web@gmail.com, monnier@iro.umontreal.ca
Subject: Re: Flymake refactored
Date: Sun, 01 Oct 2017 07:54:53 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <877ewfw0aa.fsf@udel.edu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <8760bz9rl4.fsf@jane> (Marcin Borkowski's message of "Sun, 01 Oct 2017 10:53:43 +0200")
Marcin Borkowski <mbork@mbork.pl> writes:
> On 2017-10-01, at 01:43, João Távora <joaotavora@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Marcin Borkowski <mbork@mbork.pl> writes:
>>
>>> I didn't (yet) look at it, but thanks for working on this. I use
>>> Flycheck currently (maily for JavaScript/ESlint), but I'm wondering
>>> whether to switch to flymake at some point in time. Just being curious:
>>> does Flycheck support running more linters on the same file at the same
>>
>> I don't know (did you mean Flycheck or Flymake?). If you meant Flymake,
>> then the answer is yes.
>
> I know that. I want to know whether Flycheck can do that, too. If not,
> then we have a strong advantage of Flymake.
It can, but only does so if a particular checker specifies it with the
:next-checkers keyword. For instance, the 'emacs-lisp' checker
indicates that the 'emacs-lisp-checkdoc' checker be run next.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-10-01 11:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 79+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-09-28 14:27 Flymake refactored João Távora
2017-09-28 19:52 ` Stefan Monnier
2017-09-29 0:22 ` João Távora
2017-09-29 3:11 ` Stefan Monnier
2017-10-01 16:52 ` João Távora
2017-10-01 20:50 ` Stefan Monnier
2017-10-02 1:01 ` João Távora
2017-10-02 3:12 ` Stefan Monnier
2017-10-03 0:33 ` João Távora
2017-10-03 1:09 ` Stefan Monnier
2017-09-29 12:51 ` Dmitry Gutov
2017-09-29 14:55 ` Ted Zlatanov
2017-09-29 15:03 ` Dmitry Gutov
2017-09-29 16:26 ` Ted Zlatanov
2017-09-29 17:35 ` Dmitry Gutov
2017-09-29 17:56 ` Ted Zlatanov
2017-09-30 15:07 ` Dmitry Gutov
2017-09-30 7:55 ` Marcin Borkowski
2017-09-30 23:43 ` João Távora
2017-10-01 8:53 ` Marcin Borkowski
2017-10-01 11:54 ` Mark Oteiza [this message]
2017-10-04 17:37 ` Simen Heggestøyl
2017-10-05 2:08 ` João Távora
2017-10-05 3:52 ` Mark Oteiza
2017-10-05 10:57 ` João Távora
2017-10-05 13:11 ` Stefan Monnier
2017-10-05 14:45 ` João Távora
2017-10-05 23:01 ` João Távora
2017-10-05 21:22 ` Mark Oteiza
2017-10-05 23:05 ` João Távora
2017-10-06 3:35 ` Stefan Monnier
2017-10-06 7:09 ` Lele Gaifax
2017-10-06 8:14 ` Eli Zaretskii
2017-10-06 8:19 ` Lele Gaifax
2017-10-06 9:48 ` Eli Zaretskii
2017-10-06 9:54 ` Lele Gaifax
2017-10-06 13:04 ` Mark Oteiza
2017-10-06 14:47 ` Lele Gaifax
2017-10-06 15:21 ` Mark Oteiza
2017-10-06 15:26 ` Mark Oteiza
2017-10-06 15:28 ` Lele Gaifax
2017-10-06 16:28 ` João Távora
2017-10-06 19:24 ` Lele Gaifax
2017-10-06 15:13 ` João Távora
2017-10-07 13:28 ` Stefan Monnier
2017-10-07 13:44 ` Eli Zaretskii
2017-10-07 14:40 ` Lele Gaifax
2017-10-07 14:52 ` Eli Zaretskii
2017-10-08 2:06 ` Stefan Monnier
2017-10-08 9:32 ` João Távora
2017-10-08 11:24 ` Lele Gaifax
2017-10-08 14:17 ` Stefan Monnier
2017-10-08 23:33 ` João Távora
2017-10-09 3:01 ` Stefan Monnier
2017-10-09 10:19 ` João Távora
2017-10-09 15:50 ` [SUSPECTED SPAM] " Stefan Monnier
2017-10-09 16:33 ` [PATCH] " Lele Gaifax
2017-10-07 6:31 ` Marcin Borkowski
2017-10-07 13:37 ` Stefan Monnier
2017-10-07 16:48 ` Marcin Borkowski
2017-10-06 12:54 ` John Wiegley
2017-10-06 15:17 ` Mark Oteiza
2017-10-06 16:04 ` João Távora
2017-10-06 21:22 ` Mark Oteiza
2017-10-06 22:03 ` João Távora
2017-10-07 13:31 ` Stefan Monnier
2017-10-07 16:02 ` João Távora
2017-10-07 16:07 ` João Távora
2017-10-07 18:18 ` Mark Oteiza
2017-10-08 9:06 ` João Távora
2017-10-08 12:51 ` Mark Oteiza
2017-10-08 23:21 ` João Távora
2017-10-10 14:27 ` Mark Oteiza
2017-10-10 15:20 ` João Távora
2017-10-10 16:10 ` Mark Oteiza
2017-10-05 11:28 ` Lele Gaifax
2017-10-05 15:12 ` Lele Gaifax
2017-10-10 10:40 ` Lele Gaifax
2017-10-10 12:27 ` João Távora
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=877ewfw0aa.fsf@udel.edu \
--to=mvoteiza@udel.edu \
--cc=dgutov@yandex.ru \
--cc=emacs-devel@gnu.org \
--cc=joaotavora@gmail.com \
--cc=jwiegley@gmail.com \
--cc=mbork@mbork.pl \
--cc=monnier@iro.umontreal.ca \
--cc=sdl.web@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).