From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Andreas Schwab Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Finding the dump Date: Sat, 26 Jan 2019 16:44:46 +0100 Message-ID: <877eer4e4x.fsf@igel.home> References: <83munr8jb1.fsf@gnu.org> <838szb8ey9.fsf@gnu.org> <83d0oj62bc.fsf@gnu.org> <87ef8z4g1m.fsf@igel.home> <838sz75u7p.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="236484"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.1.91 (gnu/linux) Cc: rpluim@gmail.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Jan 26 16:45:48 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1gnQ9S-000zMV-VJ for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 26 Jan 2019 16:45:47 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:60919 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gnQ9R-0001fh-NT for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 26 Jan 2019 10:45:45 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:54898) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gnQ8h-0001fP-U7 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 26 Jan 2019 10:45:00 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gnQ8h-00080Q-1D for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 26 Jan 2019 10:44:59 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-out.m-online.net ([212.18.0.9]:44189) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gnQ8e-0007sf-Q5; Sat, 26 Jan 2019 10:44:56 -0500 Original-Received: from frontend01.mail.m-online.net (unknown [192.168.8.182]) by mail-out.m-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 43n0ZS2P8Cz1qvvX; Sat, 26 Jan 2019 16:44:48 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from localhost (dynscan1.mnet-online.de [192.168.6.70]) by mail.m-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 43n0ZS220zz1qqkk; Sat, 26 Jan 2019 16:44:48 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at mnet-online.de Original-Received: from mail.mnet-online.de ([192.168.8.182]) by localhost (dynscan1.mail.m-online.net [192.168.6.70]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7tCaWAaEpCfO; Sat, 26 Jan 2019 16:44:47 +0100 (CET) X-Auth-Info: bjE5vuWGjr5bjkJMQnc6FHYAbxTXuNeTD+chO4JyFxJwG5ClXesWD1r1ibszv2JS Original-Received: from igel.home (ppp-188-174-155-253.dynamic.mnet-online.de [188.174.155.253]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.mnet-online.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA; Sat, 26 Jan 2019 16:44:47 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: by igel.home (Postfix, from userid 1000) id CEA962C1E8E; Sat, 26 Jan 2019 16:44:46 +0100 (CET) X-Yow: I HAVE a towel. In-Reply-To: <838sz75u7p.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Sat, 26 Jan 2019 17:12:10 +0200") X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 212.18.0.9 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:232701 Archived-At: On Jan 26 2019, Eli Zaretskii wrote: >> From: Andreas Schwab >> Cc: rpluim@gmail.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org >> Date: Sat, 26 Jan 2019 16:03:33 +0100 >> >> On Jan 26 2019, Eli Zaretskii wrote: >> >> > Actually, since exec-directory is versioned, there's no problem with >> > supporting emacs-X.Y.Z versions. But I added a feature whereby >> > renaming the Emacs executable and the pdump file to have the same >> > basename will also work. >> >> This depends on argv[0] being accurate, though. > > I don't think I follow. Can you give an example when it won't work as > intended? You can set argv[0] to whatever you want. It doesn't have to match the executable name in any way. Andreas. -- Andreas Schwab, schwab@linux-m68k.org GPG Key fingerprint = 7578 EB47 D4E5 4D69 2510 2552 DF73 E780 A9DA AEC1 "And now for something completely different."