From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Nicolas Petton Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Future release of emacs-26 (WAS: bug#34341) Date: Tue, 14 May 2019 14:11:33 +0200 Message-ID: <877eatutfu.fsf@petton.fr> References: <871s1ent89.fsf@gmail.com> <87pnovlr5z.fsf@gmail.com> <83k1f3k3rm.fsf@gnu.org> <87y339g9g7.fsf_-_@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="121231"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" To: Noam Postavsky , emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue May 14 14:13:19 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1hQWJ3-000VOm-MY for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 14 May 2019 14:13:17 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:47265 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hQWJ2-0004FX-Ea for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 14 May 2019 08:13:16 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:33006) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hQWHV-0003zf-QL for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 14 May 2019 08:11:42 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hQWHU-0002at-L8 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 14 May 2019 08:11:41 -0400 Original-Received: from petton.fr ([89.234.186.68]:33076) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1hQWHU-0002XT-3f for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 14 May 2019 08:11:40 -0400 In-Reply-To: <87y339g9g7.fsf_-_@gmail.com> DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=petton.fr; s=mail; t=1557835896; bh=awKdBWtwOuCAjjk3d53Oaqxc/t3HWkPbnT1qKx/zE3w=; h=From:To:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=MArDCN8Dd35VGKWdZA/xbn5rR9vyZifvaWyoZ/+N5Wo7HwRjI2arRgfGdGcLjwxO0C33uexc+gKM3PLmurNyNJi3rsw+PYuFOkN5lk7LvTs/c339pYmVnbAGG0g8YaaAQwsExSYrmhTGc0M9WW1pHQcqL6v3zy5BNanO8YCFbrE= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 89.234.186.68 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:236498 Archived-At: --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain Noam Postavsky writes: > So, I'm thinking we should be aiming for another "regular" release > around September, when the GNU ELPA package signing key expires. After > that, people downloading Emacs 26.2 won't be able to install GNU ELPA > packages without either disabling signature checking, or manually > installing the new key. I agree. Cheers, Nico --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAEBCAAdFiEE1AWqLIYsVPF+7mvg6LzXhmr8+XgFAlzasHUACgkQ6LzXhmr8 +Xg9LQf/ZsK9IA2mFKiOFK7xNwGo03eSwqMdiO6GAPY70oG2UglspW193FA+/eMG 0L1VG85Ht/peiJIIIgLkcKIKIJYDydTynP4JBGzOc9V3N/y7xM8Dq0y0s5weaPkz DgWQIq6jHn3EMBH0rOt5ZisKTQT5P5ZrFS2kAXMNHYP2NeZ3JzzjfTSsvuy1SPjy 4glKvqH1TsDCYkM1yK4uszwdP8GagH2oxV7D2kPeQXXAAyD89y4vP7kyRxjhDZoh ByARfywTSNtr9Ei2hLbwdoTHeu2Z+fTcmVnQdpi2Ql+o0QPsJQ2VNvgDQbVNOgzN RS8Wh/swu6RCM8BGJjxP6zCA/G0Iog== =zXWC -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--