From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Niklas Eklund Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Name dtache.el Date: Fri, 20 May 2022 20:44:31 +0000 Message-ID: <877d6g53yo.fsf@posteo.net> References: <87y1zq5vt7.fsf@posteo.net> <87wnf56ix0.fsf@posteo.net> <87sfpt6ikz.fsf@posteo.net> <87zgjq33tb.fsf@posteo.net> <87a6bccmfh.fsf@posteo.net> <7b7fb453-d2fa-4e72-a7f7-d6967813a291@posteo.net> <87a6bc57jl.fsf@posteo.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="22271"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: rms@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sat May 21 07:31:21 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1nsHhw-0005av-2l for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 21 May 2022 07:31:20 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:41934 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nsHhu-0004Aw-JZ for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 21 May 2022 01:31:18 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:35780) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ns9UG-0005kp-Fk for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 20 May 2022 16:44:41 -0400 Original-Received: from mout01.posteo.de ([185.67.36.65]:36473) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ns9UC-00029B-Ak for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 20 May 2022 16:44:38 -0400 Original-Received: from submission (posteo.de [185.67.36.169]) by mout01.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7431A240028 for ; Fri, 20 May 2022 22:44:33 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=posteo.net; s=2017; t=1653079473; bh=22VYShhqtMa9qcVZcYN/zjtviyHnY/sQCyVDn3rIRsk=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:From; b=rAREImZjk+qHYQ+x4xEZ2gqMfc3/zPDRBLR46sNzIa/MLFIf5fayAn6y2NHJbX0Id hURuiCSqwlZ8YmNhe/tPz7S14L2SKgJPIIbpA0IG5eaSKtrvfBjLQmqGbTzmzrsu+y 4EujctONUu8Mcw2Rh+FkKbELW+YwzNnECO1P69l9udKnKLt+mZsxS9TSY+Z/SRTgXk sDuU2VG2C/30CXZA7y7oWIcJkH+LQ/EVVFcZJeFxUJ+NY9VOlqottDSNOnaJAkkGSK 7UDwNh9a7zXhNUz6jyWM2JmUQSJnptebWE2KG+dZIyT+wWu5JyA0PLE87i8cQW0+Lp spcP/8ci+oZDg== Original-Received: from customer (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by submission (posteo.de) with ESMTPSA id 4L4dxr48Vdz9rxN; Fri, 20 May 2022 22:44:32 +0200 (CEST) In-Reply-To: <87a6bc57jl.fsf@posteo.net> Received-SPF: pass client-ip=185.67.36.65; envelope-from=niklas.eklund@posteo.net; helo=mout01.posteo.de X-Spam_score_int: -43 X-Spam_score: -4.4 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.4 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-Mailman-Approved-At: Sat, 21 May 2022 01:29:10 -0400 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:290026 Archived-At: Niklas Eklund writes: > Stefan Monnier writes: > >>> Would I then need to have two different git repositories or how would you go >>> about doing that? >> >> Yes. Would that be a problem? > > No, not really, I just asked to see if I understood what you meant :) > > So your proposal would be to: > 1) Create a new git repository for detached.el > 2) Add this package to ELPA > 3) Release a new version detached.el > 4) Update the original dtache package to require detached > 5) Make a new release of dtache > > Is this what you meant? A question about adding a require in dtache, do > I need to specify this dependency in elpa somewhere for it to work properly? Ah ok you meant adding a line similar to this one in dtache.el? ;; Package-Requires: ((company "0.8.0") (math-symbol-lists "1.3")) Seems like a smart way to communicate to users that they need to install detached.el > /Niklas