From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Akib Azmain Turja Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel,gmane.comp.gnu.guix.devel Subject: Re: guix emacs package MELPA/ELPA Date: Sat, 03 Dec 2022 20:48:18 +0600 Message-ID: <877cz8r1al.fsf@disroot.org> References: <06b8e38a-06fe-76b1-ff57-4d9ac8c7ee5f@zedat.fu-berlin.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="14266"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Arvid Krein Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sat Dec 03 16:18:13 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1p1UHN-0003WI-D8 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 03 Dec 2022 16:18:13 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1p1UGl-0008UB-UD; Sat, 03 Dec 2022 10:17:36 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1p1UGh-0008TO-O7; Sat, 03 Dec 2022 10:17:32 -0500 Original-Received: from knopi.disroot.org ([178.21.23.139]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1p1UGb-0002Ew-Im; Sat, 03 Dec 2022 10:17:30 -0500 Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by disroot.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0FDDE413CE; Sat, 3 Dec 2022 16:17:23 +0100 (CET) X-Virus-Scanned: SPAM Filter at disroot.org Original-Received: from knopi.disroot.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (disroot.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id aCKUR7w3hgnu; Sat, 3 Dec 2022 16:17:21 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=disroot.org; s=mail; t=1670080641; bh=61objog8KLVz2ID6BGTSTQnK3BEvu039qXd9TLweWJA=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From; b=BlEzHdynduNumP8WAJkrRtQuscLAmgLzcoz52zW7hCxk/teLLNWT00JOzxYfEedkd GmSrp6HMeoyRbUfmgKRO+UCiNFEmc7ceROZbfij4wMKwc2KJOsanpRRFsWDnYAZdDl V4l6dbcFjwSdRGtwJmRFTYjpgxppZUTWCw6OnUXTc5qjXkrnhSgxUhqzoAb0oiX1Jt PIYkVSWiZrzGdsIXBPUdzsYgZ9VN01V+mOOGV06h0HlDUPQvHfX5OtN+jGskxeed9K GGZjV9RtsiTmNztX2kjotSr6YkEqvzXQr9GSHtk9TOIHqcui6M/Mte8QQEsv+ZztJR 2NZoBJly88Siw== In-Reply-To: <06b8e38a-06fe-76b1-ff57-4d9ac8c7ee5f@zedat.fu-berlin.de> (Arvid Krein's message of "Sat, 3 Dec 2022 00:26:36 +0100") Received-SPF: pass client-ip=178.21.23.139; envelope-from=akib@disroot.org; helo=knopi.disroot.org X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:300873 gmane.comp.gnu.guix.devel:64601 Archived-At: --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Arvid Krein writes: > Hello guix-devel, > > this is my first time writing to this list so I hope I am at the right > place. > I noticed that the guix package for emacs was moved from being > developed at Github/Gitlab to Savannah. There is the guix package Thanks for letting me know, I thought guix.el was just dead. > 'emacs-guix'. Some people (including me) would rather use the MELPA or > ELPA package repositories for emacs. I noticed that the guix.el > package in MELPA is still refering to the old locations on > github/gitlab which are unmaintained and do not work. > I will try to get the location fixed in MELPA. But since the package > has moved closer to the guix project (if I understood it right) would > it maybe make more sense to host it on ELPA (since it is the GNU > repository)? I do not really know anything about emacs packaging which > is why I am asking. > > Greetings > > Arvid > GNU ELPA (elpa.gnu.org) is not the correct place for guix.el. GNU ELPA is for the packages that are part of GNU Emacs but not distributed with Emacs; therefore FSF holds the copyright of those packages. NonGNU ELPA is the correct place, it is for all types of free software Emacs packages that are not part of GNU Emacs. I'm CC'ing emacs-devel list, with hopes that someone will give a better explanation, or correct me. =2D-=20 Akib Azmain Turja, GPG key: 70018CE5819F17A3BBA666AFE74F0EFA922AE7F5 Fediverse: akib@hostux.social Codeberg: akib emailselfdefense.fsf.org | "Nothing can be secure without encryption." --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAEBCAAdFiEEyVTKmrtL6kNBe3FRVTX89U2IYWsFAmOLYbIACgkQVTX89U2I YWuYSxAAkYm8CPY6XI1lVrKVy2b989NFdIqtg/RK4oe1bw3LbAzicyAgkPUuTFdw B/Ax4jBqV9S55HpgIqr/q+0B+uqoOhJ7+9pXKWueN460hAzQrH5KKZzGmMT8aTwC PzSJcKbTB8HbK7pHjegXq3vG2I+rU0PY3bX7bAcRgHEw+ccwqk262axpYGZR3QaY lCwcx9BbHqP8khdNSH3GNHjqBKk++RO7+wuRypNLIagIfNQDVU+6nMdL2Zc4aYra OgRfu1kl8ohAw8JCCX49iZ/M+igsxLBloNW35TPXNyexrCZiiuHxi3LbNDCR2igi CNxWy/EbldzKLpfB9oU9Bc3XnEqq/HwtHV7dNumajfGOLeT6iIum5Dzl2WM7JLWz Xd2QYk1CaJVOmXQG8VXzJUUa1WuHmAd5IiHBMbwmbDodqFaAZrQmUpZ6PFRu3QQo udpWXdy5YmVO8JM0pjizhCaxbW1uh00MZXQHsV9qOGb0lBi7WndN87nQLt0w+9Cx I+0ae3mZTuD8s6dkAn2XnzHHobz1kHH4M34hIibvaQqgV1qAMy+KbPzgQMeP/6Pz OmCH0JzYlVb1Nn8+NJKnRxVpL6Rid8w+bktuFIqYHew/dEVPfySXZpro2eygAoZ1 xh15AMUXB3DTEB2xL+NZuGq7n5ZdSxhhn2zaZe19VGzhTNp6Zjo= =DyAS -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--