From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Miles Bader <miles@gnu.org>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: config.in
Date: 17 Apr 2002 21:09:28 +0900
Sender: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org
Message-ID: <87662q7chz.fsf@tc-1-100.kawasaki.gol.ne.jp>
References: <E16xXdG-0003g6-00@fencepost.gnu.org>
	<87g01vbhzi.fsf@tc-1-100.kawasaki.gol.ne.jp>
	<1018986015.10524.108.camel@space-ghost>
	<1676-Wed17Apr2002000044+0300-eliz@is.elta.co.il>
	<buon0w39loi.fsf@mcspd15.ucom.lsi.nec.co.jp>
	<7484-Wed17Apr2002083348+0300-eliz@is.elta.co.il>
	<buo662qamzo.fsf@mcspd15.ucom.lsi.nec.co.jp>
	<je4riak730.fsf@sykes.suse.de>
Reply-To: Miles Bader <miles@gnu.org>
NNTP-Posting-Host: localhost.gmane.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1019045542 9973 127.0.0.1 (17 Apr 2002 12:12:22 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2002 12:12:22 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@is.elta.co.il>, walters@verbum.org,
	emacs-devel@gnu.org
Return-path: <emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org>
Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244])
	by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.33 #1 (Debian))
	id 16xoIQ-0002aj-00
	for <emacs-devel@main.gmane.org>; Wed, 17 Apr 2002 14:12:22 +0200
Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([199.232.76.164])
	by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian))
	id 16xob6-0000qm-00
	for <emacs-devel@quimby.gnus.org>; Wed, 17 Apr 2002 14:31:40 +0200
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=fencepost.gnu.org)
	by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian))
	id 16xoIC-0007I7-00; Wed, 17 Apr 2002 08:12:08 -0400
Original-Received: from smtp01.fields.gol.com ([203.216.5.131])
	by fencepost.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 3.34 #1 (Debian))
	id 16xoFl-00074k-00; Wed, 17 Apr 2002 08:09:37 -0400
Original-Received: from tc-2-199.kawasaki.gol.ne.jp ([203.216.25.199] helo=tc-1-100.kawasaki.gol.ne.jp)
	by smtp01.fields.gol.com with esmtp (Magnetic Fields)
	id 16xoFh-0007uc-00; Wed, 17 Apr 2002 21:09:34 +0900
Original-Received: by tc-1-100.kawasaki.gol.ne.jp (Postfix, from userid 1000)
	id 5AB143012; Wed, 17 Apr 2002 21:09:28 +0900 (JST)
Original-To: Andreas Schwab <schwab@suse.de>
System-Type: i686-pc-linux-gnu
In-Reply-To: <je4riak730.fsf@sykes.suse.de>
Original-Lines: 14
X-Abuse-Complaints: abuse@gol.com
Errors-To: emacs-devel-admin@gnu.org
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.9
Precedence: bulk
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Subscribe: <http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Id: Emacs development discussions. <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mail.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel/>
Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:2698
X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:2698

Andreas Schwab <schwab@suse.de> writes:
> For files like config.in the chances that conflicts happen are rather low,
> unless you change configure.in in the first place.  This is quite
> different from loaddefs.el, which also contains local time stamps.

Actually the file I'm really annoyed by is `configure', which has caused
me grief in the past -- the conversation about config.in just reminded
me to complain about it.

-Miles

-- 
P.S.  All information contained in the above letter is false,
      for reasons of military security.