* lazy-lock is obsolete?
@ 2005-03-29 18:34 Stefan Monnier
2005-03-29 20:16 ` Jérôme Marant
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Stefan Monnier @ 2005-03-29 18:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
Any objection to moving lazy-lock.el to the obsolete subdirectory?
Stefan
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread* Re: lazy-lock is obsolete? 2005-03-29 18:34 lazy-lock is obsolete? Stefan Monnier @ 2005-03-29 20:16 ` Jérôme Marant 2005-03-29 22:26 ` Jason Rumney 0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread From: Jérôme Marant @ 2005-03-29 20:16 UTC (permalink / raw) Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca> writes: > Any objection to moving lazy-lock.el to the obsolete subdirectory? Any reason why it should be considered as obsolete? I do use lazy-lock mode sometimes. Cheers, -- Jérôme Marant ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: lazy-lock is obsolete? 2005-03-29 20:16 ` Jérôme Marant @ 2005-03-29 22:26 ` Jason Rumney 2005-03-30 6:45 ` Jérôme Marant 0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread From: Jason Rumney @ 2005-03-29 22:26 UTC (permalink / raw) Cc: emacs-devel Jérôme Marant <jerome.marant@free.fr> writes: > Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca> writes: > >> Any objection to moving lazy-lock.el to the obsolete subdirectory? > > Any reason why it should be considered as obsolete? jit-lock is supposed to replace it. > I do use lazy-lock mode sometimes. Do you use it because jit-lock is insufficient, or just out of habit? ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: lazy-lock is obsolete? 2005-03-29 22:26 ` Jason Rumney @ 2005-03-30 6:45 ` Jérôme Marant 2005-03-31 18:21 ` Richard Stallman 0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread From: Jérôme Marant @ 2005-03-30 6:45 UTC (permalink / raw) Quoting Jason Rumney <jasonr@gnu.org>: > Do you use it because jit-lock is insufficient, or just out of habit? I recalled that I switched from jit to lazy because it seemed to me that lazy was faster (with 21.3) Cheers, -- Jérôme Marant ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: lazy-lock is obsolete? 2005-03-30 6:45 ` Jérôme Marant @ 2005-03-31 18:21 ` Richard Stallman 2005-04-02 17:41 ` Jérôme Marant 0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread From: Richard Stallman @ 2005-03-31 18:21 UTC (permalink / raw) Cc: emacs-devel I recalled that I switched from jit to lazy because it seemed to me that lazy was faster (with 21.3) Could you try them again now, and let's see if lazy-lock is really faster now? If it is, it would be nice to know why. ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: lazy-lock is obsolete? 2005-03-31 18:21 ` Richard Stallman @ 2005-04-02 17:41 ` Jérôme Marant 0 siblings, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread From: Jérôme Marant @ 2005-04-02 17:41 UTC (permalink / raw) Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org> writes: > I recalled that I switched from jit to lazy because it seemed to me > that lazy was faster (with 21.3) > > Could you try them again now, and let's see if lazy-lock is really > faster now? If it is, it would be nice to know why. I can't really see any difference. I don't object for it to be obsoleted. Cheers, -- Jérôme Marant ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2005-04-02 17:41 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2005-03-29 18:34 lazy-lock is obsolete? Stefan Monnier 2005-03-29 20:16 ` Jérôme Marant 2005-03-29 22:26 ` Jason Rumney 2005-03-30 6:45 ` Jérôme Marant 2005-03-31 18:21 ` Richard Stallman 2005-04-02 17:41 ` Jérôme Marant
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox; as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).