From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Documentation not clear for the Lisp function set-variable Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2005 23:43:25 -0400 Message-ID: <8764vx7ruk.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org> References: <87slz6nr3h.fsf@jurta.org> <874qbi8p49.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1120017734 12304 80.91.229.2 (29 Jun 2005 04:02:14 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2005 04:02:14 +0000 (UTC) Cc: juri@jurta.org, rms@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Jun 29 06:02:13 2005 Return-path: Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DnTlu-0003cM-0Z for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 29 Jun 2005 06:01:58 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DnTts-0002vM-A8 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 29 Jun 2005 00:10:12 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1DnTmh-00083m-Hv for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 29 Jun 2005 00:02:47 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1DnTiM-0006KH-Jv for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 28 Jun 2005 23:58:22 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DnTiI-00060K-6d for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 28 Jun 2005 23:58:14 -0400 Original-Received: from [209.226.175.110] (helo=tomts43-srv.bellnexxia.net) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1DnTYS-0006wt-68; Tue, 28 Jun 2005 23:48:04 -0400 Original-Received: from alfajor ([70.49.80.233]) by tomts43-srv.bellnexxia.net (InterMail vM.5.01.06.10 201-253-122-130-110-20040306) with ESMTP id <20050629034319.OKUB2981.tomts43-srv.bellnexxia.net@alfajor>; Tue, 28 Jun 2005 23:43:19 -0400 Original-Received: by alfajor (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 63B9BD732C; Tue, 28 Jun 2005 23:43:25 -0400 (EDT) Original-To: Juanma Barranquero In-Reply-To: (Juanma Barranquero's message of "Tue, 28 Jun 2005 18:19:00 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:39863 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:39863 >> I think we should use the complete-in-turn thingy > Hmm. Some more info, please? :-) C-h f complete-in-turn RET Try C-s complete-in-turn in the lisp/ChangeLog file as well to see where it's used. > If I understand correctly, you're OK'ing the `user-variable-p' patch > and we're now discussing patching `set-variable'. AFAIC, the patch falls in the "obviously a bug-fix" category. Stefan