From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Stephen J. Turnbull" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: difference between maximized and fullscreen? Date: Thu, 02 Jul 2009 14:36:50 +0900 Message-ID: <8763ebwsr1.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> References: <4A4B9641.9090805@swipnet.se> <4A4BC2A6.3050808@swipnet.se> <8708B0D477C9458EB0C2B40175281FE4@us.oracle.com> <20090702043624.GA31404@tomas> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1246513050 30854 80.91.229.12 (2 Jul 2009 05:37:30 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 2 Jul 2009 05:37:30 +0000 (UTC) Cc: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Jan_Dj=E4rv?= , 'Emacs Development' , Drew Adams , 'John Yates' To: tomas@tuxteam.de Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Jul 02 07:37:22 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1MMEz4-0003Nt-BB for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 02 Jul 2009 07:37:22 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:59429 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MMEz3-0005hi-9y for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 02 Jul 2009 01:37:21 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MMEyu-0005gb-Qw for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 02 Jul 2009 01:37:12 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MMEyp-0005d4-Az for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 02 Jul 2009 01:37:11 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=54309 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MMEyp-0005d1-0d for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 02 Jul 2009 01:37:07 -0400 Original-Received: from mtps02.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp ([130.158.97.224]:37133) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1MMEyo-0004N7-Gv for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 02 Jul 2009 01:37:06 -0400 Original-Received: from uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp (uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp [130.158.99.156]) by mtps02.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id A61F8820E; Thu, 2 Jul 2009 14:37:03 +0900 (JST) Original-Received: by uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp (Postfix, from userid 1000) id BC72A1A3868; Thu, 2 Jul 2009 14:36:50 +0900 (JST) In-Reply-To: <20090702043624.GA31404@tomas> X-Mailer: VM 8.0.12-devo-585 under 21.5 (beta29) "garbanzo" 5bbff3553494 XEmacs Lucid (x86_64-unknown-linux) X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:111891 Archived-At: tomas@tuxteam.de writes: > FWIW[2] that seems to be "standard" window manager jargon (the > metaphor being that the window "sticks" to the glass in your CRT > from behind). Thus it might be unwise to invent something new. The use of "sticky window" to describe this feature goes back to at least 1995 when I started using fvwm. (I don't claim that fvwm invented it, it's just the first wm I used that supported this feature. I think Windowmaker also supported it, and called it "sticky window", too.)