unofficial mirror of emacs-devel@gnu.org 
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: Miles Bader <miles@gnu.org>
To: Juri Linkov <juri@jurta.org>
Cc: Tom Tromey <tromey@redhat.com>, Ken Raeburn <raeburn@raeburn.org>,
	Emacs development discussions <emacs-devel@gnu.org>
Subject: Re: advice needed for multi-threading patch
Date: Sat, 29 Aug 2009 07:15:34 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <8763c7lh4p.fsf@catnip.gol.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87fxbbll61.fsf@mail.jurta.org> (Juri Linkov's message of "Fri, 28 Aug 2009 23:48:22 +0300")

Juri Linkov <juri@jurta.org> writes:
>> 15 years ago there were grand plans, but... dunno about now.
>> It's a different world in many ways.
>
> AFAIK, Guile and Scheme as a whole still flourish these days,

There are a huge number of scheme implementations now; even thinking
just about scheme, is guile still competitive?

> and the only serious contender is Clojure that could integrate
> with Emacs the same way as it does with Java.

Why?  There are tons of random little languages around now, some very
popular (i.e., javascript), many not so much.  Clojure is not scheme, so
why is it any better than those?  [Compatibility with the java runtime
is important for some people, but AFAIK, not for Emacs!]

-Miles

-- 
.Numeric stability is probably not all that important when you're guessing.




  reply	other threads:[~2009-08-28 22:15 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 54+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-08-26  4:38 advice needed for multi-threading patch Tom Tromey
2009-08-26  7:06 ` Ken Raeburn
2009-08-26 14:52   ` Stefan Monnier
2009-08-26 18:50     ` Ken Raeburn
2009-08-27  3:12       ` Stefan Monnier
2009-08-27  6:28         ` Ken Raeburn
2009-08-27 17:02           ` Stefan Monnier
2009-08-26 16:08   ` Tom Tromey
2009-08-26 18:50     ` Ken Raeburn
2009-08-27  5:07       ` Miles Bader
2009-08-27  6:39         ` Ken Raeburn
2009-08-27  6:50           ` Miles Bader
2009-08-28 20:48             ` Juri Linkov
2009-08-28 22:15               ` Miles Bader [this message]
2009-08-28 23:27                 ` Juri Linkov
2009-08-28 23:54                   ` Miles Bader
2009-08-29 20:21                 ` Richard Stallman
2009-08-26 15:02 ` Stefan Monnier
2009-08-26 15:31   ` Tom Tromey
2009-08-26 19:18     ` Stefan Monnier
2009-09-18 22:59       ` Tom Tromey
2009-09-19  0:09         ` Stephen J. Turnbull
2009-09-19  0:32         ` Chong Yidong
2009-09-21 21:19         ` Stefan Monnier
2009-09-21 21:50           ` Tom Tromey
2009-09-22 14:24             ` Stefan Monnier
2009-09-22 23:59               ` Ken Raeburn
2009-09-23  3:11                 ` Stefan Monnier
2009-09-23 15:53                 ` Chong Yidong
2009-09-23  3:16               ` Tom Tromey
2009-09-24 17:25                 ` Stefan Monnier
2009-09-24 17:57                   ` Tom Tromey
2009-09-27 20:59                   ` Tom Tromey
2009-09-27 23:05                     ` Stefan Monnier
2009-09-28  4:27                       ` Tom Tromey
2009-09-29  0:27                         ` Stefan Monnier
2009-09-29  2:26                           ` Ken Raeburn
2009-09-29  3:20                             ` Stefan Monnier
2009-09-29  3:57                               ` Ken Raeburn
2009-09-29  3:33                             ` Tom Tromey
2009-09-29  4:07                               ` Ken Raeburn
2009-09-29  2:30                           ` Tom Tromey
2009-09-23 18:43               ` Giuseppe Scrivano
2009-09-24 17:29                 ` Stefan Monnier
2009-09-24 18:53                   ` Giuseppe Scrivano
2009-09-24 20:04                     ` Tom Tromey
2009-09-24 21:59                       ` Stefan Monnier
2009-09-24 22:23                       ` Giuseppe Scrivano
2009-09-24 22:47                       ` Ken Raeburn
2009-09-28 14:52                       ` Ted Zlatanov
2009-10-05  6:02                       ` joakim
2009-09-28  7:44               ` Lynbech Christian
2009-08-29  0:28 ` Giuseppe Scrivano
2009-08-29  4:57   ` Tom Tromey

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

  List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=8763c7lh4p.fsf@catnip.gol.com \
    --to=miles@gnu.org \
    --cc=emacs-devel@gnu.org \
    --cc=juri@jurta.org \
    --cc=raeburn@raeburn.org \
    --cc=tromey@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox

	https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).