From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Chong Yidong Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: New branch for elpa contents Date: Fri, 19 Nov 2010 11:43:16 -0500 Message-ID: <8762vtp8m3.fsf@stupidchicken.com> References: <87pqu2h3ml.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <877hg9bdx4.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87vd3tia3b.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <878w0p9tky.fsf@lifelogs.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1290185167 31986 80.91.229.12 (19 Nov 2010 16:46:07 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 19 Nov 2010 16:46:07 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Ted Zlatanov Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Nov 19 17:46:03 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PJU66-0000sJ-On for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 19 Nov 2010 17:46:02 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:38927 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PJU65-0001YV-Ve for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 19 Nov 2010 11:46:02 -0500 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=51637 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PJU3W-0008VW-Ok for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 19 Nov 2010 11:43:25 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PJU3R-0005bL-AX for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 19 Nov 2010 11:43:19 -0500 Original-Received: from pantheon-po42.its.yale.edu ([130.132.50.101]:57051) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PJU3R-0005az-8N for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 19 Nov 2010 11:43:17 -0500 Original-Received: from furball (dhcp128036014113.central.yale.edu [128.36.14.113]) (authenticated bits=0) by pantheon-po42.its.yale.edu (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id oAJGhGmS027448 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Fri, 19 Nov 2010 11:43:16 -0500 Original-Received: by furball (Postfix, from userid 1000) id B0581160854; Fri, 19 Nov 2010 11:43:16 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: <878w0p9tky.fsf@lifelogs.com> (Ted Zlatanov's message of "Fri, 19 Nov 2010 10:17:01 -0600") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-YaleITSMailFilter: Version 1.2c (attachment(s) not renamed) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.4-2.6 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:132859 Archived-At: Ted Zlatanov writes: > Sounds good. One last question: right now we assume there's just "the > package repository" but I think we should expect multiple repositories. > > Do you want to handle that by making a new branch for each repository or > by subdirectories for each? In the former case we'll need an elpa-admin > branch (for ELLE-related scripts that don't change by repository) and > the other elpa branches will just have the packages. The latter case > requires no extra work now, since we'll add repositories by making more > directories. So punting the issue is the same as picking the > subdirectory option as far as I'm concerned. Let's punt...