From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: =?utf-8?B?xaB0xJtww6FuIE7Em21lYw==?= Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: use of `mouse-face' to delimit text zones Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2011 21:17:13 +0200 Message-ID: <8762loj5ty.fsf@gmail.com> References: <4E48D309.6050503@acdlabs.ru> <83hb5jujjs.fsf@gnu.org> <874o1j10zv.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <8362lyvcli.fsf@gnu.org> <83k4aasnm9.fsf@gnu.org> <838vqmx9tj.fsf@gnu.org> <87ipppjfiq.fsf@gmail.com> <87ei0cjvow.fsf@gmail.com> <77465C28555E49ACA714C9A439EA4396@us.oracle.com> <834o18hznn.fsf@gnu.org> <8339gshsqw.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1314127347 28321 80.91.229.12 (23 Aug 2011 19:22:27 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2011 19:22:27 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Stefan Monnier , drew.adams@oracle.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Aug 23 21:22:23 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QvwYI-0002WD-9C for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 23 Aug 2011 21:22:22 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:41213 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QvwYH-0004q9-OB for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 23 Aug 2011 15:22:21 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:47291) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QvwYF-0004pt-0o for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 23 Aug 2011 15:22:19 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QvwYE-0007Q0-6c for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 23 Aug 2011 15:22:18 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-fx0-f41.google.com ([209.85.161.41]:63339) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QvwYC-0007Pe-GH; Tue, 23 Aug 2011 15:22:16 -0400 Original-Received: by fxg9 with SMTP id 9so574750fxg.0 for ; Tue, 23 Aug 2011 12:22:15 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:user-agent:date :message-id:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=xFhaywvEidZjXyLuk137yAHOtBeAGnQGvCQiMTRDRZQ=; b=ePWZ42QcNuyyySbe3lezIp3U1NMbMoccJuC3qq4r0hIxFpszhgDaQPdHsVrg3PExpw QNE7E5dn9k6y+mpcO80SpIx2u6uzHIJU8rwShQH2muKG1oMk5xSrPwjHzX4yTCDK+04B Qbi/OkL4JaGxWEPVOiWYgK7H/7eW+jf1RcsAM= Original-Received: by 10.223.16.205 with SMTP id p13mr5851821faa.69.1314127335610; Tue, 23 Aug 2011 12:22:15 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from localhost (176.119.broadband10.iol.cz [90.177.119.176]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id q3sm211831faa.15.2011.08.23.12.22.13 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Tue, 23 Aug 2011 12:22:14 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <8339gshsqw.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Tue, 23 Aug 2011 21:45:11 +0300") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-Received-From: 209.85.161.41 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:143553 Archived-At: On Tue, 23 Aug 2011 20:45:11 +0200 Eli Zaretskii wrote: >> From: Stefan Monnier >> Cc: Drew Adams , stepnem@gmail.com, emacs-devel= @gnu.org >> Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2011 14:34:25 -0400 >>=20 >> > How is Joe R. Hacker supposed to know that adding invisible characters >> > to a portion of text covered by mouse-face will break completion?? >>=20 >> We're talking about a property added *by the completion code* and *for >> the completion code*. I.e. an internal use. > > Not entirely true: when the mouse hovers above those parts of the > *Completions* buffer, the candidate under the mouse gets highlighted. > By contrast, a face added for internal purposed would be invisible to > the user. IMO it needn't (shouldn't?) even be a face at all, just a separate text property. --=20 =C5=A0t=C4=9Bp=C3=A1n