From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Julien Danjou Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: BEGIN_SRC..END_SRC Date: Mon, 07 May 2012 10:57:02 +0200 Message-ID: <8762c8weqp.fsf@zelenka.enovance.com> References: <871umzrvfw.fsf@gmail.com> <87wr4rqg6g.fsf@gmail.com> <83d36j59gv.fsf@gnu.org> <87r4uz58e3.fsf@sec.modprobe.de> <83aa1n57p4.fsf@gnu.org> <5D17181ED92C4552AE8D4404DD035CA0@us.oracle.com> <87ehqy7hod.fsf@gmail.com> <87wr4qzihq.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> <87ipga5z7q.fsf@gmail.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1336381040 4217 80.91.229.3 (7 May 2012 08:57:20 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 7 May 2012 08:57:20 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Yann Hodique Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon May 07 10:57:20 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1SRJkt-0005B8-Hn for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 07 May 2012 10:57:19 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:60945 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SRJkq-0006FN-1v for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 07 May 2012 04:57:16 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:47162) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SRJki-0006F1-3U for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 07 May 2012 04:57:13 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SRJkg-0005vk-E5 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 07 May 2012 04:57:07 -0400 Original-Received: from prometheus.naquadah.org ([212.85.154.174]:58192 helo=mx1.naquadah.org) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SRJkg-0005vP-7h for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 07 May 2012 04:57:06 -0400 Original-Received: from zelenka.enovance.com (unknown [83.167.43.235]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.naquadah.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 532D65C1BA; Mon, 7 May 2012 10:57:03 +0200 (CEST) Mail-Followup-To: Yann Hodique , emacs-devel@gnu.org In-Reply-To: <87ipga5z7q.fsf@gmail.com> (Yann Hodique's message of "Sat, 05 May 2012 19:12:25 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.130006 (Ma Gnus v0.6) Emacs/24.1.50 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-Received-From: 212.85.154.174 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:150341 Archived-At: --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sat, May 05 2012, Yann Hodique wrote: > The point of using application/emacs-lisp was just to demonstrate > something that works *today*. text/lisp or text/emacs-lisp would > definitely be cleaner, but they're not recognized as elisp code by gnus > as of now. I'm not sure what yo mean by "not recognized", but for me your example mail shows with the Emacs Lisp code inlined and font-locked by Gnus. And the result is indeed cleaner than with tags. =2D-=20 Julien --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJPp45eAAoJEGEbqVCLeKXCrBEQAIVQrnQ/B/KotDoamaaFcBel msHpGmN30cucOkfMSXiQ2j+loM4dWNj/kgXbZekvYDJ6vEpGs6wfzGNsY9yXeU/G jcshR1pZ6Wp9KHbdyDQTymBzizedtkFfSD+HRtW93Hwk/qjOgznkA04+UYszjLe1 EpeDjnZrSlPG2GlAEu/+rvzaB/c8zGjzO9uuBf2AzrxLnttBvg9U7rNcsCLGyW// aJvE+5tY2/0FKonNOjT1TdtZRBkmn/Mw+HTeinsjCxFMWDk11mSGU4TWH55HMQhQ xGGITj91aYZxkGNxoPfo/JEwPLUf3yr9MRSj/OU6+lN70MUNSkyWIApAvfxK1k6B kNE56AnqvJieuPEHhaAsoyv1QWymMHHohw4PZLrEoBYgpNOhCNEQ2Bvz+nLQ+fcv fQcjBxK9GxbnDQN+/KK2/mPRXT1g8t2d+Jg9xLCXEQnZ4Jg6uxEYAgoqcbfR5yua TGeJpRZg8GcHJlauu2lLsyJkTAYh4q6APcypdb3jko/SagYw0A9sB8OQmWdbOQS8 WafFBYjLTsLREprSTEcs9oNs0KUoFds9eGEDOi0xrE0QCINWRdCNaStgpKkpU016 JaW4OptQ0SL6k8geiiKHmHCNqq3Cg/vD/4YQXpkEF/ZEq71v+wmm0EO9kEzZbtb1 nX9wqGbbq68KaSyAHDxv =rqAZ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--