From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Daiki Ueno Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [PATCH] package.el: check tarball signature Date: Sat, 05 Oct 2013 09:34:52 +0900 Message-ID: <8761tcpnbn.fsf-ueno@gnu.org> References: <874n92x9em.fsf@flea.lifelogs.com> <87fvsk9m8b.fsf-ueno@gnu.org> <877gdutp1l.fsf@flea.lifelogs.com> <83pprkc02t.fsf@gnu.org> <87fvsgspq3.fsf@flea.lifelogs.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1380933302 782 80.91.229.3 (5 Oct 2013 00:35:02 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 5 Oct 2013 00:35:02 +0000 (UTC) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Oct 05 02:35:06 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1VSFpo-0007Kq-HM for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 05 Oct 2013 02:35:04 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:50204 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VSFpn-0007Gd-Sy for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 04 Oct 2013 20:35:03 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:48133) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VSFpk-0007GB-Bj for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 04 Oct 2013 20:35:01 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VSFpi-0005wb-La for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 04 Oct 2013 20:35:00 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:51124) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VSFpi-0005wX-I0 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 04 Oct 2013 20:34:58 -0400 Original-Received: from du-a.org ([2001:e41:db5e:fb14::1]:38084 helo=debian) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1VSFph-0006d6-Po for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 04 Oct 2013 20:34:58 -0400 In-Reply-To: <87fvsgspq3.fsf@flea.lifelogs.com> (Ted Zlatanov's message of "Fri, 04 Oct 2013 17:14:44 -0400") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.4 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: Malformed IPv6 address (bad octet value). X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:163864 Archived-At: Ted Zlatanov writes: > I can put up my current patch for review but I still have HMAC, maybe > UMAC, and RSA+DSA+ECC crypto to finish. The hashing methods and the > ciphers in ECB, CBC, and CTR modes are done with tests. Should I make a > Bazaar branch for that work? Is anyone interested in reviewing it? Probably I should shut up, but... Does that mean all the package signatures will be signed/verified with your own "Emacs internal" signature format, and all the packagers will need to use your tool and Emacs, instead of GPG, right? That is what I opposed again and again and suggested to use a standard format.