From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: David Kastrup Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Emacs completion matches selection UI Date: Tue, 07 Jan 2014 20:42:47 +0100 Organization: Organization?!? Message-ID: <8761pvpoi0.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> References: <87fvqtg02v.fsf@flea.lifelogs.com> <87eh58j0x3.fsf@flea.lifelogs.com> <87mwjvfrfy.fsf@flea.lifelogs.com> <877gawbhp0.fsf@flea.lifelogs.com> <87vby6s3ji.fsf@gmail.com> <87fvp3xjjd.fsf@gmail.com> <87sit0ekp5.fsf@flea.lifelogs.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1389123917 13823 80.91.229.3 (7 Jan 2014 19:45:17 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 7 Jan 2014 19:45:17 +0000 (UTC) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Jan 07 20:45:24 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1W0caY-0006sF-2p for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 07 Jan 2014 20:45:22 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:42504 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1W0caX-0005z8-MU for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 07 Jan 2014 14:45:21 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:58167) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1W0caQ-0005xb-RZ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 07 Jan 2014 14:45:19 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1W0caJ-0005Ru-QC for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 07 Jan 2014 14:45:14 -0500 Original-Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:38697) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1W0caJ-0005RT-J7 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 07 Jan 2014 14:45:07 -0500 Original-Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1W0caG-0006DG-Mg for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 07 Jan 2014 20:45:04 +0100 Original-Received: from x2f4af83.dyn.telefonica.de ([2.244.175.131]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 07 Jan 2014 20:45:04 +0100 Original-Received: from dak by x2f4af83.dyn.telefonica.de with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 07 Jan 2014 20:45:04 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-Lines: 25 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: x2f4af83.dyn.telefonica.de X-Face: 2FEFf>]>q>2iw=B6, xrUubRI>pR&Ml9=ao@P@i)L:\urd*t9M~y1^:+Y]'C0~{mAl`oQuAl \!3KEIp?*w`|bL5qr,H)LFO6Q=qx~iH4DN; i"; /yuIsqbLLCh/!U#X[S~(5eZ41to5f%E@'ELIi$t^ Vc\LWP@J5p^rst0+('>Er0=^1{]M9!p?&:\z]|;&=NP3AhB!B_bi^]Pfkw User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:LCgJNyVw33XgCjZu0EA3qSDS/44= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 80.91.229.3 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:167668 Archived-At: Josh writes: > On Tue, Jan 7, 2014 at 9:18 AM, João Távora wrote: >> Are any functions available that return the keymap lookup sequence used >> normally ? I wish there was something like this, but it seems hidden >> behind functions like `key-binding'. > > Related: http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=13948 current-active-maps is a built-in function in `C source code'. (current-active-maps &optional OLP POSITION) Return a list of the currently active keymaps. OLP if non-nil indicates that we should obey `overriding-local-map' and `overriding-terminal-local-map'. POSITION can specify a click position like in the respective argument of `key-binding'. [back] Actually, I think this was written by me once upon a time. -- David Kastrup