From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Ted Zlatanov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Network security manager Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2014 23:31:10 -0500 Organization: =?utf-8?B?0KLQtdC+0LTQvtGAINCX0LvQsNGC0LDQvdC+0LI=?= @ Cienfuegos Message-ID: <8761ebg6b5.fsf@lifelogs.com> References: <85a93pj1n5.fsf@stephe-leake.org> <87sihg7r73.fsf@alrua-karlstad.karlstad.toke.dk> <87a93oilxl.fsf@lifelogs.com> Reply-To: emacs-devel@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1416371474 22547 80.91.229.3 (19 Nov 2014 04:31:14 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2014 04:31:14 +0000 (UTC) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Nov 19 05:31:08 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Xqwv6-0005zz-7Y for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 19 Nov 2014 05:31:08 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:56473 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Xqwv5-0003ZC-Qm for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 18 Nov 2014 23:31:07 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:37954) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Xqwux-0003Z7-PU for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 18 Nov 2014 23:31:05 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Xqwus-0000j5-G2 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 18 Nov 2014 23:30:59 -0500 Original-Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:43712) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Xqwus-0000iw-9O for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 18 Nov 2014 23:30:54 -0500 Original-Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Xqwup-0005vg-GJ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 19 Nov 2014 05:30:51 +0100 Original-Received: from c-98-229-61-72.hsd1.ma.comcast.net ([98.229.61.72]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 19 Nov 2014 05:30:51 +0100 Original-Received: from tzz by c-98-229-61-72.hsd1.ma.comcast.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 19 Nov 2014 05:30:51 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Mail-Followup-To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-Lines: 25 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: c-98-229-61-72.hsd1.ma.comcast.net X-Face: bd.DQ~'29fIs`T_%O%C\g%6jW)yi[zuz6; d4V0`@y-~$#3P_Ng{@m+e4o<4P'#(_GJQ%TT= D}[Ep*b!\e,fBZ'j_+#"Ps?s2!4H2-Y"sx" Mail-Copies-To: never User-Agent: Gnus/5.130012 (Ma Gnus v0.12) Emacs/25.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:ClBN97xv735N4NA08wnBT1yU5sQ= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 80.91.229.3 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:177711 Archived-At: On Tue, 18 Nov 2014 16:29:30 +0100 Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen wrote: LMI> Ted Zlatanov writes: >> Also, would you like to integrate your TOFU patch with the new nsm branch? LMI> The NSM does TOFU. No patch necessary. What do you think about the verification and TOFU implementation in gnutls-cli? Please see https://gitorious.org/gnutls/gnutls/raw/master:src/cli.c inside cert_verify_callback() for the details. * uses SSH-style gnutls_store_pubkey() and gnutls_verify_stored_pubkey() to DTRT and pins the public key rather than the certificate fingerprint. The pub keys are stored by default in a way that lets the user look them up by hostname, but we can customize that. And it's mostly handled by GnuTLS internals as far as pubkey extraction and verification. * does DANE auth (although I don't know the details on DANE, the client implementation looks reasonable and Toke suggested it) * checks OCSP for revocations using cert_verify_ocsp() in the same cli.c Ted