From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Stephen J. Turnbull" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: RCS, again: another removed functionality: undo last-checkin Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2015 17:28:29 +0900 Message-ID: <876131pmj6.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> References: <87oagx6tzz.fsf@mat.ucm.es> <55FF4026.2050004@yandex.ru> <83si68nu4i.fsf@gnu.org> <87eghsfd3m.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <83k2rknr2c.fsf@gnu.org> <87mvwellmg.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> <87k2ri3w88.fsf@wanadoo.es> <83io71ljt6.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1442996944 671 80.91.229.3 (23 Sep 2015 08:29:04 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 23 Sep 2015 08:29:04 +0000 (UTC) Cc: =?utf-8?Q?=C3=93scar?= Fuentes , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Sep 23 10:28:55 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1ZefQ5-0002lL-OE for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 23 Sep 2015 10:28:53 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:46212 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZefQ4-0002pp-S8 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 23 Sep 2015 04:28:52 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:58473) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZefPw-0002pB-Mi for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 23 Sep 2015 04:28:49 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZefPq-0001Gq-Gf for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 23 Sep 2015 04:28:44 -0400 Original-Received: from shako.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp ([130.158.97.161]:52546) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZefPk-0001G0-OF; Wed, 23 Sep 2015 04:28:32 -0400 Original-Received: from uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp (uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp [130.158.99.156]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by shako.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7AFDF1C396B; Wed, 23 Sep 2015 17:28:29 +0900 (JST) Original-Received: by uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 5A99011EF83; Wed, 23 Sep 2015 17:28:29 +0900 (JST) In-Reply-To: <83io71ljt6.fsf@gnu.org> X-Mailer: VM undefined under 21.5 (beta34) "kale" cb65bfaf7110 XEmacs Lucid (x86_64-unknown-linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 130.158.97.161 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:190275 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii writes: > With such different philosophies between different back-ends, we > really have no choice. Keep in mind that this command is supposed to > be used very rarely, if at all, by users who know what they are doing, > including what it does with the current back-end. Those users are *precisely* the ones who would be offended by DWIM. If you're going to add a command because people who know what they're doing and have advanced needs, Emacs really shouldn't be second- guessing them.