From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: David Kastrup Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: New maintainer Date: Tue, 06 Oct 2015 09:39:01 +0200 Message-ID: <87612ka1ka.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> References: <5610207A.2000300@harpegolden.net> <83fv1r3gzp.fsf@gnu.org> <83bncf3f9k.fsf@gnu.org> <5610E0BC.8090902@online.de> <83si5r106e.fsf@gnu.org> <831td9z18h.fsf@gnu.org> <5612E996.7090700@yandex.ru> <56136698.6000404@online.de> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1444117159 18724 80.91.229.3 (6 Oct 2015 07:39:19 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 6 Oct 2015 07:39:19 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Andreas =?iso-8859-1?Q?R=F6hler?= Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Oct 06 09:39:19 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1ZjMqB-0008Vi-So for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 06 Oct 2015 09:39:16 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:49388 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZjMqB-0007im-7B for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 06 Oct 2015 03:39:15 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:49264) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZjMpz-0007if-1t for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 06 Oct 2015 03:39:03 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZjMpy-0004jo-8v for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 06 Oct 2015 03:39:02 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:34418) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZjMpy-0004jk-5h; Tue, 06 Oct 2015 03:39:02 -0400 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:48236 helo=lola) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1ZjMpx-0000Me-N5; Tue, 06 Oct 2015 03:39:02 -0400 Original-Received: by lola (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 2D8A7DF4A3; Tue, 6 Oct 2015 09:39:01 +0200 (CEST) In-Reply-To: <56136698.6000404@online.de> ("Andreas =?iso-8859-1?Q?R=F6hle?= =?iso-8859-1?Q?r=22's?= message of "Tue, 06 Oct 2015 08:13:44 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: Malformed IPv6 address (bad octet value). X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:191005 Archived-At: Andreas R=F6hler writes: > Am 05.10.2015 um 23:20 schrieb Dmitry Gutov: >> [ ... ] >> We really don't have enough volunteers.=20 > > [ ... ] > > Might the FSF copyright assigment policy being a major cause here? XEmacs doesn't have it and does not really fare better in that regard. Elisp is more likely to be a contributing factor. Either are not going to go away, but there have been some improvements regarding how burdensome either turn out in practice. --=20 David Kastrup