From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: =?utf-8?Q?Przemys=C5=82aw_Wojnowski?= Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Location of tests (again) (was Re: Makefile-help) Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2015 22:41:58 +0100 Message-ID: <876119sfa1.fsf@cumego.com> References: <87d1vpoees.fsf@russet.org.uk> <87r3k3igy1.fsf@russet.org.uk> <86io5ewbhg.fsf@stephe-leake.org> <8737wiyt75.fsf_-_@russet.org.uk> <87si4dsif4.fsf@cumego.com> <87oaf1wpkv.fsf@russet.org.uk> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1447191753 9820 80.91.229.3 (10 Nov 2015 21:42:33 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2015 21:42:33 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Stephen Leake , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: phillip.lord@russet.org.uk (Phillip Lord) Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Nov 10 22:42:25 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1ZwGgG-0004JI-Sh for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 10 Nov 2015 22:42:21 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:35692 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZwGgG-0005Pi-Kf for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 10 Nov 2015 16:42:20 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:46446) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZwGg2-0005OJ-St for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 10 Nov 2015 16:42:07 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZwGfx-0002bH-PQ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 10 Nov 2015 16:42:06 -0500 Original-Received: from smtp23.iq.pl ([86.111.242.228]:48789) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZwGfx-0002b3-Fo for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 10 Nov 2015 16:42:01 -0500 Original-Received: (qmail 790 invoked from network); 10 Nov 2015 21:41:59 -0000 Original-Received: from unknown (HELO namek.cumego.com) (esperanto@cumego.com@[159.205.193.173]) (envelope-sender ) by smtp22.iq.pl with AES128-GCM-SHA256 encrypted SMTP for ; 10 Nov 2015 21:41:59 -0000 In-Reply-To: <87oaf1wpkv.fsf@russet.org.uk> (Phillip Lord's message of "Tue, 10 Nov 2015 20:45:52 +0000") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 86.111.242.228 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:193976 Archived-At: phillip.lord@russet.org.uk (Phillip Lord) writes: [...] >> Sooner or later all tests will be automated anyway. > > I doubt the latter is true (simply because some display related tests > will always involve looking at emacs). Ok, "all" was exaggerated a bit, but most things can be tested automatically. > Having said that, I largely agree with you. We'd have something like? > > test/lisp > test/src [...] > test/manual I'm for "test/manual" here, but other names are fine too. (I would also change "test/src/" to "test/c", because "lisp" are sources too, after all. But I don't insist on that, especially that it may result in a flood here. ;-) )