From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: David Kastrup Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Speed of keyboard macro execution? Date: Sun, 13 Dec 2015 01:32:29 +0100 Message-ID: <876103jihu.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> References: <20151209163954.0cefcc7f@jabberwock.cb.piermont.com> <20151210120051.6be8201f@jabberwock.cb.piermont.com> <87k2omciy2.fsf@isaac.fritz.box> <20151210123312.39c417c9@jabberwock.cb.piermont.com> <83lh929omw.fsf@gnu.org> <87k2omta6x.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <83d1ue9lns.fsf@gnu.org> <87fuzat7ot.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <837fkm9ire.fsf@gnu.org> <20151210151631.3b07c461@jabberwock.cb.piermont.com> <87twnqrqgx.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <87h9jqrpa9.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <878u51swr0.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <87zixhqz44.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <87egerjkn5.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1449966765 11404 80.91.229.3 (13 Dec 2015 00:32:45 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 13 Dec 2015 00:32:45 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Eli Zaretskii , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: "Perry E. Metzger" Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Dec 13 01:32:44 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1a7uah-00075x-JY for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 13 Dec 2015 01:32:43 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:53499 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a7uag-0007r6-Rq for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 12 Dec 2015 19:32:42 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:36523) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a7uaV-0007qs-L9 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 12 Dec 2015 19:32:32 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a7uaU-0007z8-Ry for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 12 Dec 2015 19:32:31 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::e]:53223) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a7uaU-0007z4-Pw; Sat, 12 Dec 2015 19:32:30 -0500 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:38809 helo=lola) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1a7uaU-0005sa-2o; Sat, 12 Dec 2015 19:32:30 -0500 Original-Received: by lola (Postfix, from userid 1000) id A7814DF4EE; Sun, 13 Dec 2015 01:32:29 +0100 (CET) In-Reply-To: (John Wiegley's message of "Sat, 12 Dec 2015 16:16:33 -0800") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2001:4830:134:3::e X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:196192 Archived-At: John Wiegley writes: >>>>>> David Kastrup writes: > >> At any rate, it's obvious that there will neither be agreement, nor any >> example where the current mode of operation would be desirable. > > Yes, there can be agreement: Try it locally, and come back in a few > and tell me how wonderful it was. It couldn't be as wonderful as the communication style on this list, so let's just drop this. -- David Kastrup