From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Ingo Lohmar Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: RE: handling of completion table duplicates Date: Tue, 05 Apr 2016 22:29:06 +0200 Message-ID: <8760vvre99.fsf@acer.localhost.com> References: <87h9fiewnf.fsf@acer.localhost.com> <87inzyzrpa.fsf@linux-m68k.org> <0782d65f-084b-4aba-9813-83aa9a78e81b@default> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1459888189 13379 80.91.229.3 (5 Apr 2016 20:29:49 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2016 20:29:49 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Drew Adams Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Apr 05 22:29:33 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1anXbK-0006la-SK for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 05 Apr 2016 22:29:27 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:39130 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1anXbK-0000yV-5c for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 05 Apr 2016 16:29:26 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:39809) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1anXb6-0000wG-MB for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 05 Apr 2016 16:29:13 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1anXb3-0006kp-F0 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 05 Apr 2016 16:29:12 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-wm0-x242.google.com ([2a00:1450:400c:c09::242]:33898) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1anXb3-0006k8-8Z for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 05 Apr 2016 16:29:09 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-wm0-x242.google.com with SMTP id n3so7597916wmn.1 for ; Tue, 05 Apr 2016 13:29:08 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:user-agent:date :message-id:mime-version; bh=IhHpO2RoIOCwlrSoG+8vmUPTm9E9dqvHhf0AHsyXNj0=; b=Z/0p2+NhnLzhrv0XIFrQ2/7gMeIrIDhC6WbtM2w2RJXMvlhslw2gOPeSG702WIubPL i5Z3zg/MZo7dNM6nYhW9+xW0IJ7HLNBRMj2GaMBci+t+JusLaTMQiu5gXEZ/huYu/JaR 9fs4JfNwDYo8nGxi5WOaqIPWkxMAy+qWkWT0sMuJzZJYdFbdp8MUqSowL7KYNDIvIf1/ R+hhjwmvJR9ofMk1+jZGIOc3lh4rMI4D19dZ+tkLhHBKmSuM+bUk2w2ki0SDk4EO25Am XtlZzjOGMh1W9001sDUbUYg68hoDYMboIrtUmeCdMKxHAGPZ678Yxf1wb5lCUaVNhJMK rcJw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references :user-agent:date:message-id:mime-version; bh=IhHpO2RoIOCwlrSoG+8vmUPTm9E9dqvHhf0AHsyXNj0=; b=ljE7fBwkMpCVJx3A7NVb3ziv8XyLkSGv2faZ5dT5gdAwNB9lNh+5xVmWjRJmLVZ/2o aejkF6XObXVUsgJF9IiicK1zf7bFbV15tJMuEw0+QAYHN1f/RSRFmpSEymXirr/vDqaT l//nXkzSpjaRvDKqTNsJqWcgVzfRbtIzOz0eghWINWEznLdZxxy0N9IjxyHLEI0mm6nt MLSP9gagqFGRrxUTBRz86eVxoYGxXR7BYzx9hmMDCnlhkaTYFpucnhpZeLwrsaSGIqXL peMV3JN416W3BNR+Pvplt91T3I3RdsN/otB7TWuD+Tj3q3PNzzuA3Zfb3eb1a5HMYpi5 kZZA== X-Gm-Message-State: AD7BkJIP7TgdrS7caTSr0pbpWQpY5v7IU2WQOK6bBykkmGwjKI1QF18reeK6nNIJXoMp/Q== X-Received: by 10.28.53.4 with SMTP id c4mr20509515wma.34.1459888148271; Tue, 05 Apr 2016 13:29:08 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from localhost (xdsl-87-79-106-116.netcologne.de. [87.79.106.116]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id lh1sm36403088wjb.20.2016.04.05.13.29.07 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 05 Apr 2016 13:29:07 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <0782d65f-084b-4aba-9813-83aa9a78e81b@default> User-Agent: Notmuch/0.20.2+113~g6332e6e (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/25.0.90.1 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 2a00:1450:400c:c09::242 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:202752 Archived-At: Thank you, Drew, for that extensive answer. So I take it that the absence of any documentation on duplicate removal is intentional (or at least it's no oversight) --- the question would rather be "why should (or how even could) the handler remove them?"