From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Emacs 25.1.50: Isn't 2nd line of "insert" function documentation wrong? Date: Wed, 04 May 2016 18:30:55 +0200 Message-ID: <8760utyedc.fsf@gnus.org> References: NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1462379518 8368 80.91.229.3 (4 May 2016 16:31:58 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 4 May 2016 16:31:58 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel To: Robert Weiner Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed May 04 18:31:46 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1axziD-000224-So for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 04 May 2016 18:31:46 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:48958 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1axziA-00019S-51 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 04 May 2016 12:31:42 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:38936) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1axzht-0000sc-Bj for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 04 May 2016 12:31:31 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1axzhh-0003pw-CM for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 04 May 2016 12:31:19 -0400 Original-Received: from hermes.netfonds.no ([80.91.224.195]:58924) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1axzhh-0003ic-6G for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 04 May 2016 12:31:13 -0400 Original-Received: from cm-84.215.1.64.getinternet.no ([84.215.1.64] helo=mouse) by hermes.netfonds.no with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1axzhQ-00019u-4z; Wed, 04 May 2016 18:30:57 +0200 In-Reply-To: (Robert Weiner's message of "Tue, 3 May 2016 16:28:52 -0400") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.1.50 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 80.91.224.195 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:203583 Archived-At: Robert Weiner writes: > It reads: "Point and before-insertion markers move forward to end up > after the inserted text." > > Shouldn't it be: "Point and after-insertion markers move forward to > end up after the inserted text." > > This might be even better: "Point and markers with an insertion type > of t move forward to after the inserted text." Uhm... I think that sounds correct? Anybody? -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no