From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Michael Albinus Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: debbugs-0.10: two comments Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2016 14:06:02 +0200 Message-ID: <8760q0dmxh.fsf@gmx.de> References: <8737l5sin0.fsf@gmx.de> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1473768389 2697 195.159.176.226 (13 Sep 2016 12:06:29 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 13 Sep 2016 12:06:29 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.1.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: larsi@gnus.org, Emacs developers To: Tino Calancha Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Sep 13 14:06:25 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bjmTl-0008J8-Uq for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 13 Sep 2016 14:06:22 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:48413 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bjmTk-0000EI-4f for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 13 Sep 2016 08:06:20 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:59897) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bjmTd-0000Dv-Nf for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 13 Sep 2016 08:06:14 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bjmTZ-0000US-G2 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 13 Sep 2016 08:06:12 -0400 Original-Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.15.15]:54508) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bjmTZ-0000TE-5X for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 13 Sep 2016 08:06:09 -0400 Original-Received: from detlef.gmx.de ([87.146.50.47]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx003) with ESMTPSA (Nemesis) id 0MAyVY-1brRyC0RmO-009zOQ; Tue, 13 Sep 2016 14:06:04 +0200 In-Reply-To: <8737l5sin0.fsf@gmx.de> (Michael Albinus's message of "Mon, 12 Sep 2016 09:05:07 +0200") X-Provags-ID: V03:K0:gJnsbbYWzEsJC8XW8lwR8lQOgWp60PIA2eYhc6RhW3x28kKgLbQ rammuFhuWEunuVwEyCe1l6HQv+100VhFkxikqiOWNWYm/2QnnlmS/uPNsfAq9AEDDL2wyE9 H8OuIL1EncqrT/HJj74/8lQU7sCuFRUfdH0Gy0v/oDqsCr0jYdvJ9HT6uTfkmhWbHe5gHvY hTQp5pK5YJwxLQXkWqGIQ== X-UI-Out-Filterresults: notjunk:1;V01:K0:+od+/oOSs0k=:503n0aC7LyMm1rdNfZpU4l lJ8RZcW57VscBkMjR3+5Aek2VspEXCM8kv6p/O38i17HXU+WBnDBdTBBwTHSxEn+sd2bijjbC UL398iAf1ybc/tw1GFSi1OmnaSYu4MVo8geOK9Y+vPs0VAfaXSSWcBbJLh+8Jt1LE43BStYzS M0xNiSXLBCSbg2t/QZAAHCYUZ914aO9acO1+ROgYZO+cQYi3Ty5Thkme+KVqpwV5tHAo2lhCM YpmKJRKODRzfnAI3Jb1daqMIiybIRhe6Tkg6YcriQbqZQeuamCrNVp1B8F6NGTkXcQ5FzMjuX qBYNf1ZvoTojzn8I93iW32p8d9r++voiJ5rqLJRrHZSFSa48r4ji8RyRM3RD1T2rHTVmPkG0W R4VXj5TTCF3tjpHvgXzC8YrSOGO40h5cHGfzLxl+86xV0qJyw6tQIwkvivUYsojMUC9aP/GC0 bHsVFLWvhxN4UQE24z8x/x0bIQ7YxRPSEaUg6L7EIVt7lilP0UEFURQhEqy9xLc9SQRE39bw4 TrDPzSYKsn4lDDxI8+CinqD0tF+qFAFYAiWB/UOTiMu70zTHJDzm6rEw5pq2mDP9xL3e6Ds4F HZwwdi618XRIkVdj+sMEdgopZYCB5YzUwoEY1l004WsEYXkzDZDg01bvf+uRVwme4+x/lJ0Ki a6yn6qo+gxVkABuD3jVmDn1sJIEUDbXsHcZ4Qf8pg9pG5MoNQ/IaDnZNpwpQEFRcX+HqtsS66 4YkIhp5f2MFCiCKLONvzC06qdadFafJ0p4Xow6WBMzsKcEgtpYlj45S5IRFle+gxWc447hBq X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 212.227.15.15 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:207415 Archived-At: Michael Albinus writes: Hi Tino, > I agree, debbugs-gnu-trunk-directory and debbugs-gnu-branch-directory > should be user options. Will change. > > In debbugs-gnu-apply-patch, it will be checked already whether this is > set properly. If not, the directory name is requested > interactively. Shall be done in other functions as well; I'll change > this. Done. > I have already plans to extend debbugs-gnu-bugs and debbugs-org-bugs. > Currently, they allow only list of bug numbers, like "100,200,300" etc. > I want to allow also ranges, like "100-200,300-400" and so on. A special > range "-10" could mean then "the last 10 bugs". This shall fit your needs. Done also. See `debbugs-gnu-default-bug-number-list' for the default value. > Will do both next days as time permits. I've pushed this to the elpa repository, you might play with it. Within a week or so, I will release debbugs 0.11. >> Regards, >> Tino Best regards, Michael.