From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Tom Tromey Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Concurrency, again Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2016 08:04:45 -0600 Message-ID: <8760op3g8y.fsf@tromey.com> References: <87wq97i78i.fsf@earlgrey.lan> <86k2dk77w6.fsf@molnjunk.nocrew.org> <9D64B8EA-DB52-413D-AE6A-264416C391F3@iotcl.com> <83int1g0s5.fsf@gnu.org> <83twckekqq.fsf@gnu.org> <874m4aic0g.fsf@tromey.com> <7D150317-7A01-464D-8352-942631A3116B@raeburn.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1476802808 5619 195.159.176.226 (18 Oct 2016 15:00:08 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2016 15:00:08 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.1.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: Tom Tromey , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Ken Raeburn Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Oct 18 17:00:02 2016 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bwVrZ-0005oI-5T for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 18 Oct 2016 16:59:33 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:42079 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bwVrb-00068g-AX for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 18 Oct 2016 10:59:35 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:52480) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bwVrO-00066Y-CA for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 18 Oct 2016 10:59:23 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bwVrJ-0008Oy-CI for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 18 Oct 2016 10:59:22 -0400 Original-Received: from gproxy6-pub.mail.unifiedlayer.com ([67.222.39.168]:46981) by eggs.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bwVrJ-0008OV-14 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 18 Oct 2016 10:59:17 -0400 Original-Received: (qmail 23878 invoked by uid 0); 18 Oct 2016 14:59:08 -0000 Original-Received: from unknown (HELO cmgw2) (10.0.90.83) by gproxy6.mail.unifiedlayer.com with SMTP; 18 Oct 2016 14:59:08 -0000 Original-Received: from box522.bluehost.com ([74.220.219.122]) by cmgw2 with id x2yt1t00F2f2jeq012ywmC; Tue, 18 Oct 2016 08:59:07 -0600 X-Authority-Analysis: v=2.1 cv=PIacp5aC c=1 sm=1 tr=0 a=GsOEXm/OWkKvwdLVJsfwcA==:117 a=GsOEXm/OWkKvwdLVJsfwcA==:17 a=L9H7d07YOLsA:10 a=9cW_t1CCXrUA:10 a=s5jvgZ67dGcA:10 a=IkcTkHD0fZMA:10 a=CH0kA5CcgfcA:10 a=XkODJyVNAAAA:8 a=CrZo7HFtyulVcUcA2H4A:9 a=QEXdDO2ut3YA:10 a=nw1KMl95FZJmP4V4i-oK:22 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=tromey.com; s=default; h=Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID: In-Reply-To:Date:References:Subject:Cc:To:From; bh=uaAj3wrlv8SxFyMw0m16Pwip7E6D5y4H8BAD+z9QZB0=; b=I+8wJgnMnPjmtUA5tavk/ceofd MTP1lq2Jz0UA0Aq/oNAmm0nnCFgXRNc2XJTBZQT1wLD2JRCp/n47u/ZPhFgoeNOahvfB8B9Ayf5dv WLUGKkMrHg7XghZyHBk5kM0nq; Original-Received: from 174-16-143-211.hlrn.qwest.net ([174.16.143.211]:58550 helo=pokyo) by box522.bluehost.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.86_1) (envelope-from ) id 1bwV0Z-0003IF-9u; Tue, 18 Oct 2016 08:04:47 -0600 X-Attribution: Tom In-Reply-To: <7D150317-7A01-464D-8352-942631A3116B@raeburn.org> (Ken Raeburn's message of "Tue, 18 Oct 2016 03:58:04 -0400") X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - box522.bluehost.com X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - gnu.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - tromey.com X-BWhitelist: no X-Source-IP: 174.16.143.211 X-Exim-ID: 1bwV0Z-0003IF-9u X-Source: X-Source-Args: X-Source-Dir: X-Source-Sender: 174-16-143-211.hlrn.qwest.net (pokyo) [174.16.143.211]:58550 X-Source-Auth: tom+tromey.com X-Email-Count: 4 X-Source-Cap: ZWx5bnJvYmk7ZWx5bnJvYmk7Ym94NTIyLmJsdWVob3N0LmNvbQ== X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 3.x X-Received-From: 67.222.39.168 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:208427 Archived-At: >>>>> "Ken" =3D=3D Ken Raeburn writes: Ken> In fact, in order to get a better Ken> understanding of it, I set up a private repository where I broke up Ken> the concurrency branch changes =E2=80=94 not each commit, but the over= all diff Ken> from the branch point =E2=80=94 into little pieces, separating straigh= tforward Ken> but pervasive changes from more subtle changes so I could figure out Ken> what the latter were doing. The result of my merge that I checked in Ken> was in fact the result of rebasing those little changes onto the Ken> latest master branch, fixing them up as necessary as I went along. Ken> (But the resulting body of code was checked in as a merge commit so as Ken> to preserve history of the work on the branch =E2=80=94 what change wa= s put Ken> in, who fixed what bugs, etc; I wasn=E2=80=99t about to unilaterally t= hrow Ken> that away. It was just a slow, tedious, manual merge process instead Ken> of an automated one.) Your branch sounds promising. Ken> * one thread per terminal? This was something I thought would be useful, but not a must-have. Tom