From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Karl Fogel Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Should `revert-buffer' preserve text-scaling by default? Date: Sun, 01 Dec 2019 11:35:46 -0600 Message-ID: <875zj0uex9.fsf@red-bean.com> References: <87fti6toq7.fsf@red-bean.com> <83pnhao1re.fsf@gnu.org> <8736e6tm51.fsf@red-bean.com> <83imn1omkf.fsf@gnu.org> <87d0d8xxzu.fsf@red-bean.com> <87fti4cpdv.fsf@gmx.de> Reply-To: Karl Fogel Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: blaine.gmane.org; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:195.159.176.226"; logging-data="76069"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@blaine.gmane.org" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: Eli Zaretskii , Stefan Kangas , Stefan Monnier , Emacs developers To: Michael Albinus Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Dec 01 18:35:59 2019 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1ibT8Y-000JfD-Bt for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 01 Dec 2019 18:35:58 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:53626 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ibT8X-0007u3-79 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 01 Dec 2019 12:35:57 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:48323) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ibT8P-0007tg-W6 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 01 Dec 2019 12:35:50 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ibT8P-0003Gg-3w for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 01 Dec 2019 12:35:49 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-oi1-x22d.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4864:20::22d]:37273) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ibT8O-0003FJ-Vc; Sun, 01 Dec 2019 12:35:49 -0500 Original-Received: by mail-oi1-x22d.google.com with SMTP id x195so1107037oix.4; Sun, 01 Dec 2019 09:35:48 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=sender:from:to:cc:subject:references:reply-to:date:in-reply-to :message-id:user-agent:mime-version; bh=RFlnWJKGgWlTi9PaiE8VJMiJF5OZKPeP11k32SQ7/zQ=; b=LwUtXfDg6xcawpy8FTNbwjCtBX1EExO25GfpeQmWWQ3Yc6v0hUQOE4mPPeiiexkmNU 7nZ574cQRAMX9BBtaNBUa9jjXAFzoByX46HIO8iEbt9b6kSLZrq70dDYVKCE2NzVNFeq qnPsnsHnE9roJIR8suFsT4PcKI5sYAwHS6vrm2pSp6wphbo7Tp8F7JhazYrNKD4m1dQQ o3tJLkRr13Na1nfOZqPGi644FKhVXSfXyQ263F/KFjgDBH/OsRFIedJkx3Gw+xFij94E 7eBcwIcO0Qn9OTurrdveJkG0tn0PGYVE12Yjgf0VCME76ipjSa6/C1SzugBs9r54iqr1 uQ5w== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:from:to:cc:subject:references:reply-to :date:in-reply-to:message-id:user-agent:mime-version; bh=RFlnWJKGgWlTi9PaiE8VJMiJF5OZKPeP11k32SQ7/zQ=; b=fvgCEOdWuyH1iuPUM0Gvny1oDdpo8Hac5FLfA1VB1d8cGu02XYYvHz/KD8ZjyTta7R 0usnyskRnZPhCnFu1RasQ6MazMdzG42fFg68JXb27z0DSNr1Unco/cJ8v94dnJsGvQvJ PFt6q5w5ItZMwSWoBMGFpXxPNd1AUCtTY1njLOYin8SL/VG3KX63/Swzl+3VfbSIhgDP Y6NGlsBiTUXTAmLFBOB/UpQ084EhvNxCqUaMaqdtl6k8Vi1tA3rYtYaLruYHvWnwvGB/ qyYwFeLdTRfOSznp7G3J3bTImU37wX7/u4T9gH2UnZGcY1wMCQMsmQ3c/28EKNMu1n+9 PifQ== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAUC0S1QtCaklzFwaa9GznG1+smtboLrwEUyGL16afwy6BuF7ec+ 9UcYmR6pxUMsqCl28qS/05GWc0KO X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqx3oMoaLxfivYu9Rl5izjJ9BPCbhRCPSlaq3O5JEdV9UuM32gF37Xxm6a7ITb6Jy3vlndazjw== X-Received: by 2002:a54:4084:: with SMTP id i4mr9244114oii.72.1575221747920; Sun, 01 Dec 2019 09:35:47 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from floss ([2602:306:3707:da30:c93d:4821:2abf:42d9]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id g18sm9922395otg.50.2019.12.01.09.35.46 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Sun, 01 Dec 2019 09:35:47 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <87fti4cpdv.fsf@gmx.de> (Michael Albinus's message of "Sun, 01 Dec 2019 11:27:08 +0100") X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 2607:f8b0:4864:20::22d X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:242960 Archived-At: On 01 Dec 2019, Michael Albinus wrote: >I haven't tested, but wouldn't it be sufficient if these minor modes >add the `permanent-local' property to their buffer-local variables? Thank you for pointing that out (that property was unknown to me). I'd make sure to look into that, though there might be other consequences to setting that property, so I can't say yes or no without further research. Best regards, -Karl