From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: =?utf-8?Q?=C3=93scar_Fuentes?= Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: The Emacs master is much slower than the emacs-27 branch. Date: Fri, 04 Dec 2020 21:47:53 +0100 Message-ID: <875z5hxpqe.fsf@telefonica.net> References: <877dpyzg9d.fsf@rub.de> <87czzpsyqn.fsf@gmx.net> <83o8j9eqwx.fsf@gnu.org> <874kl1spe9.fsf@gmx.net> <83blf9em55.fsf@gnu.org> <87zh2tr82r.fsf@gmx.net> <87v9dhr7i5.fsf@gmx.net> <838sadefiw.fsf@gnu.org> <87r1o5r22z.fsf@gmx.net> <837dpxedmz.fsf@gnu.org> <87mtytqza8.fsf@gmx.net> <87im9hqwov.fsf@gmx.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="21604"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Cancel-Lock: sha1:VlmaTKgrmoNnPQBcoHnY+xv1rKs= Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Fri Dec 04 22:18:43 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1klITS-0005WB-LZ for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 04 Dec 2020 22:18:42 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:57138 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1klITR-0005pr-NF for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 04 Dec 2020 16:18:41 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:41422) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1klHzm-0007nz-OE for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 04 Dec 2020 15:48:02 -0500 Original-Received: from static.214.254.202.116.clients.your-server.de ([116.202.254.214]:43068 helo=ciao.gmane.io) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1klHzl-0006tR-5J for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 04 Dec 2020 15:48:02 -0500 Original-Received: from list by ciao.gmane.io with local (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1klHzi-0001cT-6u for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 04 Dec 2020 21:47:58 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Received-SPF: pass client-ip=116.202.254.214; envelope-from=ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; helo=ciao.gmane.io X-Spam_score_int: -16 X-Spam_score: -1.7 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.7 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.248, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:260324 Archived-At: Stephen Berman writes: > Well, I went ahead and configured emacs-27 --with-cairo --without-xft, > rebuilt and ran the benchmark, and it still took ~60 seconds. I've > attached the profile because it is considerably longer than the other > emacs-27 profiles, though in general it seems similar to me, but maybe > an expert will spot a significant difference. What happens if you build with CFLAGS='-O2' ?