From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Philip Kaludercic Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [PATCH] Speed up project-kill-buffers Date: Mon, 03 May 2021 17:25:17 +0000 Message-ID: <875yzzspaa.fsf@posteo.net> References: <87mttcgnke.fsf@posteo.net> <871raoezl0.fsf@posteo.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="23209"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Mon May 03 19:29:59 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1ldcOM-0005vH-QR for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 03 May 2021 19:29:58 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:35460 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ldcOL-0004dw-SL for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 03 May 2021 13:29:57 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:51256) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ldcJw-0007RB-Fp for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 03 May 2021 13:25:24 -0400 Original-Received: from mout01.posteo.de ([185.67.36.65]:33603) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ldcJt-00028F-W7 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 03 May 2021 13:25:24 -0400 Original-Received: from submission (posteo.de [89.146.220.130]) by mout01.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 030E0240026 for ; Mon, 3 May 2021 19:25:18 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=posteo.net; s=2017; t=1620062719; bh=86/1p5Tg7ZZ4KVLI3K49rqlqjPXZrE7dL1hi7rktJGo=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Autocrypt:Date:From; b=DBh4ocgo/fUMB+IcGhSu0NmofO2w4nEnnVfJM++8XViFYgMiEKfE1dDeJKhPgcKDq 54gSMx6WLknfZxd4R6hXh1H2om0V10jAxQ4WLyLkZsR01iQ7C1D6dJZxpYcFqpfUNe xPjqQt7skoxjKlezLDbKyhpLXAJ5PVaQmMw3bQGTp/d3ptSbbxdXwcghs8dP2YgDxr Zjj6IxG/gJdowJ1VRaY/Uvz54XszZYAlSD1fAJZrcCkQhPqt9FcZ0OLIFIwfKRSduZ 74Xf3aH9HzEFEIPLPXq/jJK/MlJWM1fVrj/tPKos15UoMZWcF9zMiiIB4OZ3L9ERft zs6+Yli7UeC0A== Original-Received: from customer (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by submission (posteo.de) with ESMTPSA id 4FYqcG2Y5Sz9rxl; Mon, 3 May 2021 19:25:18 +0200 (CEST) Autocrypt: addr=philipk@posteo.net; prefer-encrypt=mutual; keydata= mDMEYHHqUhYJKwYBBAHaRw8BAQdAp3GdmYJ6tm5McweY6dEvIYIiry+Oz9rU4MH6NHWK0Ee0QlBo aWxpcCBLYWx1ZGVyY2ljIChnZW5lcmF0ZWQgYnkgYXV0b2NyeXB0LmVsKSA8cGhpbGlwa0Bwb3N0 ZW8ubmV0PoiQBBMWCAA4FiEEDM2H44ZoPt9Ms0eHtVrAHPRh1FwFAmBx6lICGwMFCwkIBwIGFQoJ CAsCBBYCAwECHgECF4AACgkQtVrAHPRh1FyTkgEAjlbGPxFchvMbxzAES3r8QLuZgCxeAXunM9gh io0ePtUBALVhh9G6wIoZhl0gUCbQpoN/UJHI08Gm1qDob5zDxnIHuDgEYHHqUhIKKwYBBAGXVQEF AQEHQNcRB+MUimTMqoxxMMUERpOR+Q4b1KgncDZkhrO2ql1tAwEIB4h4BBgWCAAgFiEEDM2H44Zo Pt9Ms0eHtVrAHPRh1FwFAmBx6lICGwwACgkQtVrAHPRh1Fw1JwD/Qo7kvtib8jy7puyWrSv0MeTS g8qIxgoRWJE/KKdkCLEA/jb9b9/g8nnX+UcwHf/4VfKsjExlnND3FrBviXUW6NcB In-Reply-To: (Stefan Monnier's message of "Mon, 03 May 2021 09:24:20 -0400") Received-SPF: pass client-ip=185.67.36.65; envelope-from=philipk@posteo.net; helo=mout01.posteo.de X-Spam_score_int: -43 X-Spam_score: -4.4 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.4 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:268825 Archived-At: Stefan Monnier writes: >> I didn't know about that function! Just tried it out and it seems that >> the patch below is even faster, as project-current does not have to be >> invoked for every buffer, remote or not. > > I think it might misbehave if you have projects nested in the directory > of other projects, tho. That is true, but this leads to the more general question of whether a sub-project is part of the super-project or not? Is there any reason to intrinsically prefer one over the other? > Stefan -- Philip K.