From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Karl Fogel Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [External] : Re: [PATCH] When deleting in bookmark menu, prompt for confirmation. Date: Fri, 07 May 2021 12:42:29 -0500 Message-ID: <875yzu5tkq.fsf@red-bean.com> References: <87a6pcqy7s.fsf@red-bean.com> <83czu86o46.fsf@gnu.org> <835z006jpl.fsf@gnu.org> <87im3z3f8f.fsf@red-bean.com> <83zgxb67g2.fsf@gnu.org> <87mtt9sqh4.fsf@red-bean.com> <87czu58uso.fsf@gnus.org> <878s4tq8e6.fsf@red-bean.com> <874kfguail.fsf@red-bean.com> <875yzwtkuj.fsf@gmail.com> Reply-To: Karl Fogel Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="20589"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: Lars Ingebrigtsen , Stefan Monnier , Drew Adams , "emacs-devel@gnu.org" To: Matthias Meulien Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Fri May 07 19:44:25 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lf4WV-0005GO-H6 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 07 May 2021 19:44:23 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:44132 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lf4WU-0004p8-K5 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Fri, 07 May 2021 13:44:22 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:49194) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lf4Uk-0003yO-1C for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 07 May 2021 13:42:34 -0400 Original-Received: from sanpietro.red-bean.com ([45.79.25.59]:34972) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1lf4Ui-0007ze-9Z for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 07 May 2021 13:42:33 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=red-bean.com; s=202005newsp; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID: In-Reply-To:Date:Reply-To:References:Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description; bh=Jzd7DqmhrinD8ySefuVdgSaFub2MTJKiGHsZotCSh/c=; t=1620409351; x=1621618951; b=mIIDCu9U91dUddNRnPETRE9cCD95GYyjKhuOXTmGZ4k6gK0Hv2Pbdt0ITOp9P5zBk7wn0UbOFn pG8klbw81MWjAE9KTFbTHIjvjS/WSKntr+ZTqLw3HlHsQw7GZfI+eWu3pbTHS2L6mpex6VTHIfIso AIxygjuGycnaNqEChb522z6AQ6+6fItEjOdLZnSIUXpuzMzUVA5Puvnee780Ji0j9xBV3rfWAIMlM 3yDVAI8KO0RssaEG6XmU+tQ00DPXeMd7in4urqA3E7/w9+2tsMlO43GoKsS4weG1l5u7KgZaZekaN TLgwG3RYUqbXGmp1JPO6uPnaLPrMArYqMhoqA==; Original-Received: from [12.106.183.66] (port=4547 helo=kwork) by sanpietro.red-bean.com with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1lf4Ug-0001ah-Eh; Fri, 07 May 2021 17:42:30 +0000 In-Reply-To: <875yzwtkuj.fsf@gmail.com> (Matthias Meulien's message of "Thu, 06 May 2021 08:52:36 +0200") Received-SPF: pass client-ip=45.79.25.59; envelope-from=kfogel@red-bean.com; helo=sanpietro.red-bean.com X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:269012 Archived-At: On 06 May 2021, Matthias Meulien wrote: >>>From my pov and usage (one bookmark file for work projects and >>another >one, the default one, for personnal projects and common bookmarks >like >download folder, Python documentation, etc.) this makes loading >multiple >bookmark files deeply broken (but that's another discussion). Agreed. However, since we don't get many bug reports about it in practice, I'm not sure it's worth solving. If anything, it might be an argument for removing the multiple-bookmark-files functionality and just admitting that everyone's just using the one default file :-).