From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Jonas Bernoulli Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Entering emojis Date: Wed, 03 Nov 2021 00:40:18 +0100 Message-ID: <875ytaazz1.fsf@bernoul.li> References: <87cznths5j.fsf@gnus.org> <87ee87cwju.fsf@gnus.org> <83sfwmwubd.fsf@gnu.org> <875ytid54b.fsf@gnus.org> <83ilxiwqok.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="34249"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii , Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Wed Nov 03 00:51:18 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mi3Yj-0008hr-N7 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 03 Nov 2021 00:51:18 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:42060 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mi3Yi-0001WN-6q for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 02 Nov 2021 19:51:16 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:55980) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mi3OE-0002Eg-UW for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 02 Nov 2021 19:40:33 -0400 Original-Received: from mail.hostpark.net ([212.243.197.30]:50260) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mi3OB-0003Kc-KB; Tue, 02 Nov 2021 19:40:26 -0400 Original-Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.hostpark.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F64A163FC; Wed, 3 Nov 2021 00:40:21 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=bernoul.li; h= content-type:content-type:mime-version:message-id:date:date :references:in-reply-to:subject:subject:from:from:received :received; s=sel2011a; t=1635896418; bh=xkQl8GORyPVtlNUrp+kA1pYK NPJe3wQx45m2WtwcP6A=; b=jrfblFjQS5kleiND0jnL9IGVF8RiWDaNConwZUvn VPzRr+4q1YmzduEHse5GKtiGbTvw1Gk0GNGBYUWP4t819b7i6wwvX9fEUyRU4VIM X24Je9XM4NaYOPUZrKq3iQkipVOl63fpqBPcANZi1UMxgUm+yLiQkcq4zyAkAG7m U7Y= X-Virus-Scanned: by Hostpark/NetZone Mailprotection at hostpark.net Original-Received: from mail.hostpark.net ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail1.hostpark.net [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10224) with ESMTP id J7f5n41rgp4K; Wed, 3 Nov 2021 00:40:18 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: from customer (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mail.hostpark.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E8A8A163D7; Wed, 3 Nov 2021 00:40:18 +0100 (CET) In-Reply-To: <83ilxiwqok.fsf@gnu.org> Received-SPF: none client-ip=212.243.197.30; envelope-from=jonas@bernoul.li; helo=mail.hostpark.net X-Spam_score_int: -27 X-Spam_score: -2.8 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.8 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:278546 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii writes: >> > Would it make sense to install this on the release branch? Since it's >> > a new orthogonal feature, it cannot possibly break anything else, just >> > be broken by itself, right? >> >> It requires changes to transient.el to work, unfortunately. > > I've seen them, but they, too, seem orthogonal, or somewhat safe, or > both? > > Jonas, what is your opinion about the safety of the changes in > transient.el that Lars added recently? Very safe. If there's a bug it should only affect new transients that set the new `variable-pitch' slot.