From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Karl Fogel Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [PATCH] Improve sorting in the bookmark list buffer. Date: Sun, 24 Apr 2022 12:30:34 -0500 Message-ID: <875ymymls5.fsf@red-bean.com> References: <875yovm1m6.fsf@elite.giraud> <87v8wvkk64.fsf@red-bean.com> <83v8wuj3v0.fsf@gnu.org> <87tucewgu7.fsf@red-bean.com> <83lexqi3z9.fsf@gnu.org> <87tuceuo4b.fsf@red-bean.com> <83czj2hrdv.fsf@gnu.org> <87a6e5lui6.fsf@elite.giraud> <837d99j10x.fsf@gnu.org> <874k4dlpeg.fsf@elite.giraud> <834k4divrt.fsf@gnu.org> <87wnh9k43g.fsf@elite.giraud> <83v8wth5lh.fsf@gnu.org> <87h78afndq.fsf@red-bean.com> <87zgm25d9o.fsf@elite.giraud> <87zgkfbp9l.fsf_-_@red-bean.com> <83h76nshm8.fsf@gnu.org> Reply-To: Karl Fogel Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="19987"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/29.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: manuel@ledu-giraud.fr, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sun Apr 24 19:31:59 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1nig5W-0004zN-W3 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 24 Apr 2022 19:31:59 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:49880 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nig5V-0007Xo-F1 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 24 Apr 2022 13:31:57 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:43636) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nig4H-0006j9-G3 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 24 Apr 2022 13:30:41 -0400 Original-Received: from sanpietro.red-bean.com ([45.79.25.59]:52550) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nig4F-00073d-R0; Sun, 24 Apr 2022 13:30:41 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=red-bean.com; s=202005newsp; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID: In-Reply-To:Date:Reply-To:References:Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description; bh=GBLu4EU8T4sxLaHPm1ycvx7oWXAqineRf+BJdjVc6QQ=; t=1650821436; x=1652031036; b=XLq6bsMj+gUBzgy8YV5blf8Y0fU68SfqFbXxOYcJxGRjsSXbQZXkf5roNPhMU4hhHnYclFsPiIA LYWX/7i60c11xKexMVDZ6sB3Q6clBv8Nesf2Wo9k7sFnLF8DGmBpw9G5Lmtn2S8Q431jgGkLLe1To dHoMG3XVj8h8xseSh5HFehKAgmEbeYNuJFjf8SovN4KbJ0g/i4MAsa7ED3EdLyYZFxqN17fAaq7cW CfSWjDSH+r9l3iAl4qaD8t+NmgcQx5F7lhhu0OoCd6Q+a3rY9eebVakhznGWN4cNLWWmwPaBs5Miv +hjNXULv4YkMly6IN4plDU0ytzz+XAtdy+UQ==; Original-Received: from 99-112-125-163.lightspeed.cicril.sbcglobal.net ([99.112.125.163]:36530 helo=floss) by sanpietro.red-bean.com with esmtpsa (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1nig4A-002CWg-7Y; Sun, 24 Apr 2022 17:30:35 +0000 In-Reply-To: <83h76nshm8.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Wed, 20 Apr 2022 22:02:39 +0300") Received-SPF: pass client-ip=45.79.25.59; envelope-from=kfogel@red-bean.com; helo=sanpietro.red-bean.com X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:288834 Archived-At: On 20 Apr 2022, Eli Zaretskii wrote: >I think this should go to master, since this isn't a recent >regression, right? And I replied: >That's right, it's not a regression. The bugs that this fixes >have been present for a long time. Shall I put it on 'master'? While I'd like to hear from Manuel, I don't want to block on that, and I've tested the patch pretty thoroughly. Based on our previous correspondence, it sounds like 'master' is the right destination. Best regards, -Karl