From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Po Lu Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Merging feature/android Date: Thu, 09 Mar 2023 16:07:04 +0800 Message-ID: <875ybal55j.fsf@yahoo.com> References: <87edq7ztks.fsf.ref@yahoo.com> <87y1obsamf.fsf@yahoo.com> <0100f288-fcc0-8b91-5f12-18bf22969e50@cs.ucla.edu> <87ttyzs8q1.fsf@yahoo.com> <253e9494-6f78-89b7-8f5f-9c2e8461d95a@cs.ucla.edu> <878rgaspvs.fsf@yahoo.com> <86bkl6z1sc.fsf@aarsen.me> <87mt4qqi2o.fsf@yahoo.com> <83a60q84eo.fsf@gnu.org> <87a60qqb0c.fsf@yahoo.com> <83y1oa6k71.fsf@gnu.org> <87sfehpfcv.fsf@yahoo.com> <83a60o7mif.fsf@gnu.org> <87jzzspvcl.fsf@yahoo.com> <83ttyw65v5.fsf@gnu.org> <4B15D851-5638-48E6-A789-3017A1CBA971@yahoo.com> <8584ff7c-f83e-18b1-1300-dfa0788e4443@cs.ucla.edu> <87v8jbohk4.fsf@yahoo.com> <831qlz5pas.fsf@gnu.org> <87356en2w7.fsf@yahoo.com> <83o7p22xq4.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="3859"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Cc: eggert@cs.ucla.edu, arsen@aarsen.me, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Thu Mar 09 09:08:05 2023 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1paBJl-0000r0-1o for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Thu, 09 Mar 2023 09:08:05 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1paBJB-0000mK-DY; Thu, 09 Mar 2023 03:07:29 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1paBJ1-0000kz-06 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 09 Mar 2023 03:07:22 -0500 Original-Received: from sonic301-2.consmr.mail.bf2.yahoo.com ([74.6.129.41]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1paBIz-0004wN-Be for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 09 Mar 2023 03:07:18 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s2048; t=1678349235; bh=74MIrKegshRkWwpd00fd6Rl6iATU2LzEaW8MeV8J/g0=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From:Subject:Reply-To; b=H1cnjk7TgSBrhcULkSnmh7YPjUNLVe4hRgtLryKSadoQWYRU0rCSOwhKHXuUQlyo8h0huOVm1GtR9azNscVFH/z0gS78UJwIY7IfNvSJsvftDHJF/wGw0JXVSvSs5shL0q1xbH+Z/r2FGKrhkbkHxYfkYBrd069gwLA97hRDsFA4j96moMwuWMwfBplPB0Hhcy//FC/AX2kS0f9O2kaXMVKndRbeLeVsqEubQ3K6hh+eMAXXi7jp9MO3G9LqJurpsEVsJGMU1kCqtqH49dsBBZexpL7Zn5+3xFQu5Ys1RN7q3WZeixjr2txyqw6SkNT3DG5rS8uHGWwHty7MuPFy2g== X-SONIC-DKIM-SIGN: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s2048; t=1678349235; bh=O8JVUcr5UOtd+2CBYIIAZNn9xaZvzjzDK2hWDbhPeMY=; h=X-Sonic-MF:From:To:Subject:Date:From:Subject; b=C4kLtu7907VK+XKEBmtH8fFghG73J0hi7Svg11JFlY6AuBiGiaNzdiYZrq8WrGPkIw/ilynAd2S2ec+p6+5nj7i06bTyYCugfIml2yvMuOoIDGBoACpO+o932tm1Qem/cDB7W6Td1Pzagkd9kIPAuuRb4vQjcLjv5PxzN4HN3VXV82VDeoF6CRBIbR5JfDtJCKeZYdsZC4PreQyGvEzoTvxifyNhp7fTRC+THv4vxH+dIy5dXNrXXLxMWxgrGxAsxJP0lWR9J/MO1rhF2XgU3eQHzHFgttGQn3jQ7nTQgu1p861dhujWEqDhnXQSqF63sVOGhnQxJuyXYcJBDqVUwA== X-YMail-OSG: 0LMqKBAVM1n_ZMQJEvtbzSBZbtyFR3d2q7ftDMioYBI_Ey8uttTmWAGd8xHn2g9 HuIqcyKEMYIsi9DM33o0FgDLBNaF.o5GL6Kt1G84Pm6cSkFo4802LysOhNWkXz0noz39ogLqzf7T umRJO5jeH7iG1qPdbZDg7JMEBqp8ZcWKEfP8AL3y0FP_QD3ufri_.yUSza8I_ee41zuTxA39df97 P4Nqx.gF7R.ibeH5EwwZYN2i2_61ygdIlxCO2Rawgkv19SICfbtNC3z4X2lSwfYAQxPWnjVDzpB6 4birqj85KsyweiD9r1bYSHl1lUZ07uFhxCXr5JxoWDysKhrHnSfu.oCLhwrWiWAIBWSofgQwT96z c.O2mrdjPpK_VPqcciPKSeaRqo7T9UEZ56KCWEONLKL8x4c1CqmiPXXnM2Puro2z8Oeib2uPDcZJ oURUmvX5vkczoiZ923fq4Neddi6FmincZVq5Hr_0VYpaPmG230V1iniGc3lJlYS9EKVH2Z4mLjbk SG9GNzELkZ8OVqaPkBHeH0Bjs8RqEz4NDTRtdSKT1gUty.SjqrGEIH5P.uydYjEfPDhrnj.RerCR 63FLhPIKy38ADARY6UBICeIa69DhMFFNBKaP2AlCaGikpZSjFR9RMApyYlFpysu1v7jj3xHvYRiv 0jlt2VURJgNydWdkAj9mMTiv_XdqPbs.DQF2S7hM_U1xOYWOv4ammsf4r3SMuloHVsqt_XZzCUzu REG3Fw7anOm_jkCRlY7SIAPehJ7kkCczVnpN7vKYHpuVAyOI9BVIymoNnAM20jHbUUO.oFum0yPH FRBECHN5l0kIS_.x3Yo1Ac7z2EQzCZ8b4r1NxFNBAO X-Sonic-MF: Original-Received: from sonic.gate.mail.ne1.yahoo.com by sonic301.consmr.mail.bf2.yahoo.com with HTTP; Thu, 9 Mar 2023 08:07:15 +0000 Original-Received: by hermes--production-sg3-67c57bccff-5lh9j (Yahoo Inc. Hermes SMTP Server) with ESMTPA ID b34894fd2a8a7281a5965f5b51b8f97e; Thu, 09 Mar 2023 08:07:12 +0000 (UTC) In-Reply-To: <83o7p22xq4.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Thu, 09 Mar 2023 09:24:51 +0200") X-Mailer: WebService/1.1.21284 mail.backend.jedi.jws.acl:role.jedi.acl.token.atz.jws.hermes.yahoo Received-SPF: pass client-ip=74.6.129.41; envelope-from=luangruo@yahoo.com; helo=sonic301-2.consmr.mail.bf2.yahoo.com X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:304168 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii writes: > I disagree with your conclusion, and I still think we should complain > noisily if modules cannot be supported. OK, but I still think this is a very bad idea. Do you object to rewriting emacs-module.c to not utilize __attribute__ ((cleanup))? What was said earlier by some people is wrong: as-is, in Emacs, it makes no difference whether or not we write: foo __attribute__ ((cleanup (module_reset_handlerlist)))... or: foo... module_reset_handlerlist (foo); Not on Emacs 29, of course. We could even go back to using __attribute__ ((cleanup)) if it is available, and use the portable approach otherwise.