From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Florian Weimer Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: MAIL_USE_FLOCK and Debian. Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2003 22:20:50 +0100 Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Message-ID: <874r7238p9.fsf@deneb.enyo.de> References: <87lm0ijabw.fsf@raven.i.defaultvalue.org> <87znoxi93a.fsf@raven.i.defaultvalue.org> <87ptpqhqjp.fsf@raven.i.defaultvalue.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: main.gmane.org 1045516763 12032 80.91.224.249 (17 Feb 2003 21:19:23 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@main.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2003 21:19:23 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org Return-path: Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 18ksfY-00037o-00 for ; Mon, 17 Feb 2003 22:19:20 +0100 Original-Received: from monty-python.gnu.org ([199.232.76.173]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian)) id 18ksu7-0005lA-00 for ; Mon, 17 Feb 2003 22:34:24 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.10.13) id 18kshi-0004Jr-07 for emacs-devel@quimby.gnus.org; Mon, 17 Feb 2003 16:21:34 -0500 Original-Received: from list by monty-python.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.10.13) id 18kshR-0004Jf-00 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 17 Feb 2003 16:21:17 -0500 Original-Received: from mail by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.10.13) id 18kshP-0004Gy-00 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 17 Feb 2003 16:21:16 -0500 Original-Received: from cygnus-ext.enyo.de ([212.9.189.162] helo=mail.enyo.de) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.10.13) id 18kshG-00044L-00; Mon, 17 Feb 2003 16:21:07 -0500 Original-Received: from [212.9.189.171] (helo=deneb.enyo.de) by mail.enyo.de with esmtp (Exim 3.34 #2) id 18ksgT-0007wd-00; Mon, 17 Feb 2003 22:20:17 +0100 Original-Received: from fw by deneb.enyo.de with local (Exim 3.34 #4) id 18ksh0-0001Az-00; Mon, 17 Feb 2003 22:20:50 +0100 Original-To: Rob Browning In-Reply-To: <87ptpqhqjp.fsf@raven.i.defaultvalue.org> (Rob Browning's message of "Mon, 17 Feb 2003 09:31:38 -0600") User-Agent: Gnus/5.090013 (Oort Gnus v0.13) Emacs/21.2 (i386-pc-linux-gnu) Original-cc: rms@gnu.org X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1b5 Precedence: list List-Id: Emacs development discussions. List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Archive: List-Unsubscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:11720 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:11720 Rob Browning writes: > OK. After thinking about it a bit more, I agree. You're absolutely > right that a run-time setting would be better. However, part of the > problem is that this policy is currently handled by the external > movemail program, so we'd have to figue out how to allow runtime > customization. Maybe Emacs can offer access to the relevant system calls, so movemail can be implemented in Lisp? It can't be *that* hard...