From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Kai Grossjohann Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Files in wrong subdirs of emacs/lisp? Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2003 16:37:53 +0000 Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Message-ID: <874qvyozdq.fsf@emptyhost.emptydomain.de> References: <87wu8vxtqg.fsf@emptyhost.emptydomain.de> NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1071765614 4508 80.91.224.253 (18 Dec 2003 16:40:14 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2003 16:40:14 +0000 (UTC) Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Thu Dec 18 17:40:06 2003 Return-path: Original-Received: from quimby.gnus.org ([80.91.224.244]) by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1AX1C2-0001ne-00 for ; Thu, 18 Dec 2003 17:40:06 +0100 Original-Received: from monty-python.gnu.org ([199.232.76.173]) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1AX1C2-0007tH-00 for ; Thu, 18 Dec 2003 17:40:06 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.24) id 1AX28J-0008Pa-GC for emacs-devel@quimby.gnus.org; Thu, 18 Dec 2003 12:40:19 -0500 Original-Received: from list by monty-python.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.24) id 1AX284-0008OZ-Qo for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 18 Dec 2003 12:40:04 -0500 Original-Received: from mail by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.24) id 1AX27X-0008Bc-UD for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 18 Dec 2003 12:40:03 -0500 Original-Received: from [80.91.224.249] (helo=main.gmane.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.24) id 1AX27X-0008Av-4b for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 18 Dec 2003 12:39:31 -0500 Original-Received: from list by main.gmane.org with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1AX1A4-0007aj-00 for ; Thu, 18 Dec 2003 17:38:04 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-Received: from sea.gmane.org ([80.91.224.252]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1AX1A2-0007ab-00 for ; Thu, 18 Dec 2003 17:38:02 +0100 Original-Received: from news by sea.gmane.org with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1AX1A2-00015t-00 for ; Thu, 18 Dec 2003 17:38:02 +0100 Original-Lines: 16 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org User-Agent: Gnus/5.1003 (Gnus v5.10.3) Emacs/21.2 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:Zk3KsvloGJttN8WW07IU6jvIoB4= X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.2 Precedence: list List-Id: Emacs development discussions. List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+emacs-devel=quimby.gnus.org@gnu.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:18746 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:18746 storm@cua.dk (Kim F. Storm) writes: > By default, CUA remaps C-z and C-v keys, and makes C-x and C-c behave > "intelligently" when the region is active, but you can easily > customize those bindings away and still use other cua features (like > the shift region making). I was very happy using CUA, but I did turn the key remappings off. Maybe going whole hog is too radical a change, but I think that even old-school Emacs users who resist change will like CUA-with-keys-turned-off. What do people think about perhaps enabling CUA with keys turned off? Kai