From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: gnus/html2text.el Date: Tue, 26 Oct 2004 23:08:57 -0400 Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Message-ID: <874qkgq2rg.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org> References: <200410250246.i9P2kku06530@raven.dms.auburn.edu> <87acu9osia.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org> <200410270143.i9R1hiJ07120@raven.dms.auburn.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1098846604 6539 80.91.229.6 (27 Oct 2004 03:10:04 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2004 03:10:04 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org, rms@gnu.org, storm@cua.dk Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Oct 27 05:09:53 2004 Return-path: Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1CMeC9-0000uU-00 for ; Wed, 27 Oct 2004 05:09:53 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CMeJs-0008DQ-8H for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 26 Oct 2004 23:17:52 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1CMeJl-0008DG-SI for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 26 Oct 2004 23:17:45 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1CMeJl-0008Cv-59 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 26 Oct 2004 23:17:45 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CMeJk-0008CY-Kq for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 26 Oct 2004 23:17:44 -0400 Original-Received: from [209.226.175.184] (helo=tomts22-srv.bellnexxia.net) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1CMeBq-000074-Pk; Tue, 26 Oct 2004 23:09:35 -0400 Original-Received: from alfajor ([67.71.35.140]) by tomts22-srv.bellnexxia.net (InterMail vM.5.01.06.10 201-253-122-130-110-20040306) with ESMTP id <20041027030901.LVKW2542.tomts22-srv.bellnexxia.net@alfajor>; Tue, 26 Oct 2004 23:09:01 -0400 Original-Received: by alfajor (Postfix, from userid 1000) id E79562FD6A; Tue, 26 Oct 2004 23:08:57 -0400 (EDT) Original-To: Luc Teirlinck In-Reply-To: <200410270143.i9R1hiJ07120@raven.dms.auburn.edu> (Luc Teirlinck's message of "Tue, 26 Oct 2004 20:43:44 -0500 (CDT)") User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/21.3.50 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:29012 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:29012 > When I use `with-no-warnings', I first compile without the > `with-no-warnings', to see which warnings I get, then I put in the form > and compile again. Nice theory. And next thing you know reality strikes: when you modify code do you first remove all "with-no-warnings", recompile, check the output and then put the with-no-warnings back in? If you could ensure that the code within with-no-warnings was never gonna change (and that the functions/macros it uses will never again be changed either), it would be OK, but that's not how things actually happen. Stefan