From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: =?iso-8859-15?q?J=E9r=F4me_Marant?= Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Emacs for powerpc64 Date: Sun, 24 Apr 2005 14:12:23 +0200 Message-ID: <874qdwe5lk.fsf@marant.org> References: <87u0lx8yii.fsf@marant.org> <878y398kdn.fsf@marant.org> <23120dfee76c16c34b48366a05750860@raeburn.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1114344666 30675 80.91.229.2 (24 Apr 2005 12:11:06 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 24 Apr 2005 12:11:06 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Andreas Schwab , emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Apr 24 14:11:01 2005 Return-path: Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DPfws-0003WZ-MA for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 24 Apr 2005 14:10:54 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DPg2B-0004Yx-Vs for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 24 Apr 2005 08:16:24 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1DPg1t-0004UB-IS for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 24 Apr 2005 08:16:05 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1DPg1q-0004R7-Vp for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 24 Apr 2005 08:16:04 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DPfzr-00012c-Gd for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 24 Apr 2005 08:13:59 -0400 Original-Received: from [213.228.0.44] (helo=postfix3-1.free.fr) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1DPg1n-0002vF-Dp for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 24 Apr 2005 08:15:59 -0400 Original-Received: from amboise (mol92-4-82-227-97-206.fbx.proxad.net [82.227.97.206]) by postfix3-1.free.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id DFC201734C5; Sun, 24 Apr 2005 14:12:45 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: by amboise (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 8123A2C05D; Sun, 24 Apr 2005 14:12:24 +0200 (CEST) Original-To: Ken Raeburn In-Reply-To: <23120dfee76c16c34b48366a05750860@raeburn.org> (Ken Raeburn's message of "Sun, 24 Apr 2005 00:28:01 -0400") User-Agent: Gnus/5.1007 (Gnus v5.10.7) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:36325 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:36325 Ken Raeburn writes: > On Apr 23, 2005, at 13:37, J=E9r=F4me Marant wrote: >> Hmm, one question though: why isn't it necessary to redefine constants >> like BITS_PER_LONG, BITS_PER_EMACS_INT, EMACS_INT and so on, as done in >> the (for instance) AMD64 port file? > > I don't think it's actually needed in the AMD64 port either. The way > these get defined should work properly on any 64-bit system that > defines _LP64. Ah, OK. > Somewhere I've got a source tree (from before I got hosed with work > and stopped being able to contribute) where one of my few pending > patches was the deletion of some of these symbols from the AMD > support, like I did for the Alpha in, oh, wow, was it back in 2002? > But I didn't get to test out or check in the AMD changes... Maybe > soon, now that I've got access to an AMD x86_64 system, and some > amount of spare time, I can fix that, and contribute a little more as > well. Thanks. --=20 J=E9r=F4me Marant