From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: called by a process filter? Date: Wed, 11 May 2005 16:19:11 -0400 Message-ID: <874qd95xet.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org> References: NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1115843445 12674 80.91.229.2 (11 May 2005 20:30:45 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 11 May 2005 20:30:45 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed May 11 22:30:42 2005 Return-path: Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DVxpd-0005Go-3O for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 11 May 2005 22:29:25 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DVxyQ-0003Lz-Ru for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 11 May 2005 16:38:30 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1DVxtx-0001Jg-5L for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 11 May 2005 16:33:53 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1DVxts-0001Hl-Ft for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 11 May 2005 16:33:49 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DVxtr-00013T-8N for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 11 May 2005 16:33:47 -0400 Original-Received: from [209.226.175.188] (helo=tomts25-srv.bellnexxia.net) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1DVxmF-0004vd-Vh for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 11 May 2005 16:25:56 -0400 Original-Received: from alfajor ([67.68.217.114]) by tomts25-srv.bellnexxia.net (InterMail vM.5.01.06.10 201-253-122-130-110-20040306) with ESMTP id <20050511201913.KUBW27245.tomts25-srv.bellnexxia.net@alfajor>; Wed, 11 May 2005 16:19:13 -0400 Original-Received: by alfajor (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 76F05D72FF; Wed, 11 May 2005 16:19:12 -0400 (EDT) Original-To: Kevin Rodgers In-Reply-To: (Kevin Rodgers's message of "Wed, 11 May 2005 13:39:08 -0600") User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:36997 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:36997 > I have a function that is installed on after-change-functions, and which > tries to detect whether the change that triggered it is a user-invoked > character insertion and thus of interest. But if the change was done by > a process filter (in particular gnuserv-process-filter -> gnuserv-eval), > examining this-command, last-command-event, and/or the result of > (this-command-keys) is completely unreliable because the process filter > runs independently of the command loop. Could you give us more info about what you're trying to do. Maybe there's a better way. Stefan