From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: image-load-path / tool-bar icons / dumped Emacs with images.el Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2005 10:40:52 -0400 Message-ID: <874q7bkkbc.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org> References: <739FCE66-7AB2-4375-A4EC-32473BF1EFFC@inf.ed.ac.uk> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1129910137 26930 80.91.229.2 (21 Oct 2005 15:55:37 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2005 15:55:37 +0000 (UTC) Cc: David Reitter , rms@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Oct 21 17:55:35 2005 Return-path: Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1ESzB6-0000cf-H5 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 21 Oct 2005 17:51:32 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1ESzB5-0004qp-Ru for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 21 Oct 2005 11:51:31 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1ESy4t-0001q5-4v for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 21 Oct 2005 10:41:03 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1ESy4q-0001pb-6G for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 21 Oct 2005 10:41:01 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1ESy4o-0001pU-TL for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 21 Oct 2005 10:40:59 -0400 Original-Received: from [209.226.175.74] (helo=tomts20-srv.bellnexxia.net) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1ESy4m-0006pV-3a; Fri, 21 Oct 2005 10:40:56 -0400 Original-Received: from alfajor ([70.48.83.21]) by tomts20-srv.bellnexxia.net (InterMail vM.5.01.06.10 201-253-122-130-110-20040306) with ESMTP id <20051021144053.QAHR26550.tomts20-srv.bellnexxia.net@alfajor>; Fri, 21 Oct 2005 10:40:53 -0400 Original-Received: by alfajor (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 05B98D72C1; Fri, 21 Oct 2005 10:40:52 -0400 (EDT) Original-To: storm@cua.dk (Kim F. Storm) In-Reply-To: (Kim F. Storm's message of "Fri, 21 Oct 2005 09:30:12 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:44505 Archived-At: > In general, maybe we could set "run-once" hook variables to t after > they have run, and signal an error if someone tries to modify a hook > which is t. Sounds like a good idea. But I'm wondering how many such hooks exist and what happens to code that checks (eq foo-hook t) when Emacs changes cause the hook to not be t any more because it may be run again later (I'm thinking of things like term-setup-hook which currently can only be run once but which may be run several times once we add multi-tty). Stefan