From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Chong Yidong Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: thumbs.el and transparency Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2006 10:12:02 -0500 Message-ID: <874q3llph9.fsf@stupidchicken.com> References: <17366.53124.274532.548329@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> <87y814vhxj.fsf@jurta.org> <17367.17105.271024.157799@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> <17369.17978.521026.397616@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> <17369.59246.383626.699005@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> <17372.1305.835753.613893@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1138641215 31196 80.91.229.2 (30 Jan 2006 17:13:35 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2006 17:13:35 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Jan 30 18:13:31 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1F3caM-0006K2-JP for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 30 Jan 2006 18:13:04 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1F3cdK-0000nK-1G for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 30 Jan 2006 12:16:06 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1F3akP-00040K-EM for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 30 Jan 2006 10:15:18 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1F3akJ-0003xZ-Jb for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 30 Jan 2006 10:15:15 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1F3akI-0003w7-0Z for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 30 Jan 2006 10:15:10 -0500 Original-Received: from [18.95.6.104] (helo=localhost.localdomain) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1F3aic-00059c-0A for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 30 Jan 2006 10:13:26 -0500 Original-Received: by localhost.localdomain (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 29A351E42E4; Mon, 30 Jan 2006 10:12:03 -0500 (EST) Original-To: Juanma Barranquero In-Reply-To: (Juanma Barranquero's message of "Mon, 30 Jan 2006 12:23:02 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:49759 Archived-At: Juanma Barranquero writes: >> E.g. tumme.el (which even the author says is "not complete") was added >> in December 2005 -- who knows when _that_ is ready for release? > > I've been hesitating to add a tiny feature^ to bs.el... and suddenly > rcirc.el (75 KiB, 1,672 non-comment, non-blank lines) is included. > Then tumme.el (99 KiB, 1,783 lines). Then erc, with a whopping 35 > files, 657 KiB and 13,818 lines of code... Note: I have nothing > against these packages, they seem to be fine pieces of code; it's just > that adding them does not seem very consistent with having a feature > freeze. Maybe the rationale was that the CVS tree was getting a little too stable ;-)