From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Chong Yidong <cyd@stupidchicken.com>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: gnus makes emacs lose response
Date: Sat, 16 Sep 2006 16:22:39 -0400
Message-ID: <874pv7zhm8.fsf@stupidchicken.com>
References: <m33bb0n00b.fsf@kfs-l.imdomain.dk>
	<jwv7j0cxsz6.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org>
NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1158438060 26187 80.91.229.2 (16 Sep 2006 20:21:00 GMT)
X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org
NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 16 Sep 2006 20:21:00 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org, Leon <sdl.web@gmail.com>,
	"Kim F. Storm" <storm@cua.dk>
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Sep 16 22:20:58 2006
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165])
	by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1GOgen-00089V-B0
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 16 Sep 2006 22:20:57 +0200
Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43)
	id 1GOgem-0005FM-Rx
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 16 Sep 2006 16:20:56 -0400
Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1GOgec-0005Ep-85
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 16 Sep 2006 16:20:46 -0400
Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1GOgeY-0005Da-75
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 16 Sep 2006 16:20:45 -0400
Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GOgeY-0005DQ-0N
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 16 Sep 2006 16:20:42 -0400
Original-Received: from [18.19.1.138] (helo=cyd)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1GOgh0-0007rf-Lu
	for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 16 Sep 2006 16:23:14 -0400
Original-Received: by cyd (Postfix, from userid 1000)
	id D774F4E3E1; Sat, 16 Sep 2006 16:22:39 -0400 (EDT)
Original-To: Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca>
In-Reply-To: <jwv7j0cxsz6.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org> (Stefan Monnier's message
	of "Sun\, 10 Sep 2006 00\:10\:30 -0400")
User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux)
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
	<mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:59923
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel/59923>

Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca> writes:

>> (gdb) p Qnil
>> $1 = 137562313
>> (gdb) p Vquit_flag
>> $2 = 137562313
>> (gdb) p immediate_quit
>> $3 = 0
>> (gdb) p Vinhibit_quit
>> $4 = 137562361
>
> So inhibit-quit is non-nil, so shouldn't my patch have caught this?
> What does the xbacktrace look like?

Could we get this discussion moving again?