From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Stephen J. Turnbull" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: cannot understand Elisp manual node Glyphs Date: Thu, 08 Feb 2007 18:58:05 +0900 Message-ID: <874ppxgedu.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> References: <87y7n9ins4.fsf@catnip.gol.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1170928265 12282 80.91.229.12 (8 Feb 2007 09:51:05 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 8 Feb 2007 09:51:05 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Emacs-Devel , Drew Adams , "Kim F. Storm" To: Miles Bader Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Feb 08 10:50:48 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1HF5vT-0000xv-27 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 08 Feb 2007 10:50:47 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HF5vS-0007at-8U for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 08 Feb 2007 04:50:46 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HF5uw-0007ZH-10 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 08 Feb 2007 04:50:14 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HF5uu-0007WW-6N for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 08 Feb 2007 04:50:13 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HF5ut-0007WA-7T for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 08 Feb 2007 04:50:11 -0500 Original-Received: from mtps02.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp ([130.158.97.224]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1HF5us-00005B-3o; Thu, 08 Feb 2007 04:50:10 -0500 Original-Received: from uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp (uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp [130.158.99.156]) by mtps02.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id DBEF57FF6; Thu, 8 Feb 2007 18:50:03 +0900 (JST) Original-Received: by uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 2B6851A26C1; Thu, 8 Feb 2007 18:58:06 +0900 (JST) In-Reply-To: <87y7n9ins4.fsf@catnip.gol.com> X-Mailer: VM 7.17 under 21.5 (beta27) "fiddleheads" (+CVS-20060716) XEmacs Lucid X-detected-kernel: Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:66114 Archived-At: Miles Bader writes: > Good idea, but why not just call it "make-glyph"...? FWIW, that has wildly different semantics in XEmacs.