From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Juri Linkov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Scratch buffer annoyance Date: Sat, 28 Jul 2007 00:20:46 +0300 Organization: JURTA Message-ID: <874pjp4imx.fsf@jurta.org> References: <871wf5cv6y.fsf@jurta.org> <7dbe73ed0707190725l426d0731u5f9c36cd14278f78@mail.gmail.com> <87k5st7iqt.fsf@jurta.org> <87sl7ebwtk.fsf@jurta.org> <87sl7d9w9s.fsf@jurta.org> <854pjt9hsr.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1185573526 8660 80.91.229.12 (27 Jul 2007 21:58:46 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 27 Jul 2007 21:58:46 +0000 (UTC) Cc: rms@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: David Kastrup Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Jul 27 23:58:40 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1IEXpX-0004wH-EW for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 27 Jul 2007 23:58:39 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IEXpX-0004Ll-2A for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 27 Jul 2007 17:58:39 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1IEXox-0001fI-W5 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 27 Jul 2007 17:58:04 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1IEXov-0001Ry-6u for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 27 Jul 2007 17:58:03 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IEXou-0001Qt-VS for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 27 Jul 2007 17:58:01 -0400 Original-Received: from relay01.kiev.sovam.com ([62.64.120.200]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1IEXoq-0006wL-CO; Fri, 27 Jul 2007 17:57:56 -0400 Original-Received: from [83.170.232.243] (helo=smtp.svitonline.com) by relay01.kiev.sovam.com with esmtp (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1IEXoo-000MsQ-4Q; Sat, 28 Jul 2007 00:57:54 +0300 In-Reply-To: <854pjt9hsr.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> (David Kastrup's message of "Wed\, 25 Jul 2007 07\:24\:52 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.1.50 (gnu/linux) X-Scanner-Signature: 7ffaa6bc246e67c9b1a22e0c753f4a43 X-DrWeb-checked: yes X-SpamTest-Envelope-From: juri@jurta.org X-SpamTest-Group-ID: 00000000 X-SpamTest-Header: Not Detected X-SpamTest-Info: Profiles 1293 [July 27 2007] X-SpamTest-Info: helo_type=3 X-SpamTest-Method: none X-SpamTest-Rate: 0 X-SpamTest-Status: Not detected X-SpamTest-Status-Extended: not_detected X-SpamTest-Version: SMTP-Filter Version 3.0.0 [0255], KAS30/Release X-detected-kernel: FreeBSD 4.8-5.1 (or MacOS X 10.2-10.3) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:75725 Archived-At: >> Index: lisp/startup.el >> ^^^^^^^^^^ >> (defgroup initialization nil >> "Emacs start-up procedure." >> ^^^^^^^^ >> ! :group 'internal) >> (defcustom inhibit-splash-screen nil >> "Non-nil inhibits the startup screen. >> ^^^^^^^ >> (defgroup initialization nil >> "Emacs start-up procedure." >> ^^^^^^^^ >> ! (defcustom initial-buffer nil >> ! "Buffer to show after starting Emacs." >> ^^^^^^^^ >> (defcustom inhibit-splash-screen nil >> "Non-nil inhibits the startup screen. >> ^^^^^^^ >> ;; Maybe display a startup screen. >> ^^^^^^^ >> ;; Display a startup screen, after some preparations. >> ^^^^^^^ > > Something is wrong here: DOC strings and comments very consistently > talk of "startup screen", yet the variable and group names themselves > draw from some irregular use of "initial", "initialization" and > "splash". I think these names could be unified under the same name later after achieving an agreement on the best one. -- Juri Linkov http://www.jurta.org/emacs/