From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Chong Yidong Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Frame size changes Date: Sun, 05 Oct 2008 17:50:12 -0400 Message-ID: <874p3q90ff.fsf@cyd.mit.edu> References: <877i8qvq5k.fsf@cyd.mit.edu> <48E5C4E5.9040400@swipnet.se> <873ajdtuhz.fsf@cyd.mit.edu> <48E7191F.7060407@swipnet.se> <87od1y99gi.fsf@cyd.mit.edu> <87tzbqlpbp.fsf@cyd.mit.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1223243347 19329 80.91.229.12 (5 Oct 2008 21:49:07 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 5 Oct 2008 21:49:07 +0000 (UTC) Cc: jan.h.d@swipnet.se, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Oct 05 23:50:05 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1KmbUJ-0003AD-BR for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 05 Oct 2008 23:50:03 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:53011 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KmbTF-0001Ji-NF for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 05 Oct 2008 17:48:57 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KmbTA-0001Gh-S1 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 05 Oct 2008 17:48:52 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KmbT9-0001Dw-Bu for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 05 Oct 2008 17:48:52 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=48990 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KmbT9-0001Dr-19 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 05 Oct 2008 17:48:51 -0400 Original-Received: from cyd.mit.edu ([18.115.2.24]:58657) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1KmbT5-0006iu-52; Sun, 05 Oct 2008 17:48:47 -0400 Original-Received: by cyd.mit.edu (Postfix, from userid 1000) id A8CC057E0B4; Sun, 5 Oct 2008 17:50:12 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Sun, 05 Oct 2008 23:23:25 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.60 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:104357 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii writes: > It is still not clean, IMO, to use these variables in order to decide > if we are initializing. I understand this concern, but on the other hand it's also not perfectly satisfactory to introduce a separate variable either, since the information provided by after-init-time is a strict superset of the information given by that separate variable. To handle the corner case where Emacs is dumped twice, we can make startup.el reset after-init-time to nil just before it begins initialization. We should probably do that anyway.