From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Chong Yidong Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Can we apply this patch for bug 84 and 425? Date: Tue, 07 Oct 2008 17:05:18 -0400 Message-ID: <874p3oktf5.fsf@cyd.mit.edu> References: <87prmc9sd3.fsf@cyd.mit.edu> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1223413622 21414 80.91.229.12 (7 Oct 2008 21:07:02 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 7 Oct 2008 21:07:02 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: joakim@verona.se Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Oct 07 23:07:59 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1KnJmY-0001n4-7K for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 07 Oct 2008 23:07:50 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:46570 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KnJlU-0004qo-EK for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 07 Oct 2008 17:06:44 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KnJib-0003JO-VA for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 07 Oct 2008 17:03:45 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KnJia-0003Hk-Dg for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 07 Oct 2008 17:03:45 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=34525 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KnJia-0003HV-3k for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 07 Oct 2008 17:03:44 -0400 Original-Received: from cyd.mit.edu ([18.115.2.24]:44072) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1KnJiZ-0004p5-In for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 07 Oct 2008 17:03:43 -0400 Original-Received: by cyd.mit.edu (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 42AA257E0BF; Tue, 7 Oct 2008 17:05:19 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: (joakim@verona.se's message of "Tue, 07 Oct 2008 22:31:05 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.60 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:104403 Archived-At: joakim@verona.se writes: > Chong Yidong writes: > >> joakim@verona.se writes: >> >>> These bugs are both about hangs when emacs deals with external processes: >>> http://emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=84 >>> http://emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=425 >>> Markus Triska has a patch which reduces my experiences of the hang >>> from about once a day to not at all so far. >>> >>> How can we proceed with this patch? >> >> According to Markus in the discussion in #425, these two bugs were due >> to #562, which was fixed by undefining HAVE_RES_INIT on darwin. Is this >> patch still necessary? > > Well I still experience the problem without Marcus patch, on Fedora core > 9, i686 GNU/Linux. I see. The patch looks fairly safe; I think it can be checked in.