From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Stephen J. Turnbull" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: bzr repository ready? Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 15:18:59 +0900 Message-ID: <874oocy1po.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> References: <87einvxy9c.fsf@red-bean.com> <20091118230952.GB908@muc.de> <87my2jw05z.fsf@red-bean.com> <83skc9pbf7.fsf@gnu.org> <87iqd5vw5n.fsf@red-bean.com> <877htl53tc.fsf@telefonica.net> <871vjs6ci7.fsf@telefonica.net> <87d43c4f1e.fsf@telefonica.net> <87ocmwtlbs.fsf@red-bean.com> <87tywnd4iw.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> <87pr7a9kob.fsf@red-bean.com> <87vdh1sryt.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> <873a4591zi.fsf@red-bean.com> <87bpituttt.fsf@red-bean.com> <87ws1hyy8o.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> <87skc5rqlw.fsf@red-bean.com> <878wdpkq9p.fsf@red-bean.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1259561712 12292 80.91.229.12 (30 Nov 2009 06:15:12 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 30 Nov 2009 06:15:12 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Karl Fogel Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Nov 30 07:15:04 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1NEzXM-00082v-Dv for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 30 Nov 2009 07:15:04 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:33911 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NEzXL-0005p9-Uy for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 30 Nov 2009 01:15:03 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NEzWB-0005SE-Uo for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 30 Nov 2009 01:13:52 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NEzW7-0005Q0-85 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 30 Nov 2009 01:13:51 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=58058 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NEzW6-0005Pi-Jn for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 30 Nov 2009 01:13:46 -0500 Original-Received: from mtps01.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp ([130.158.97.223]:43365) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1NEzW5-0004mK-Bj for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 30 Nov 2009 01:13:45 -0500 Original-Received: from uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp (uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp [130.158.99.156]) by mtps01.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id 04C041535AE; Mon, 30 Nov 2009 15:13:41 +0900 (JST) Original-Received: by uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp (Postfix, from userid 1000) id C96311A290A; Mon, 30 Nov 2009 15:18:59 +0900 (JST) In-Reply-To: <878wdpkq9p.fsf@red-bean.com> X-Mailer: VM 8.0.12-devo-585 under 21.5 (beta29) "garbanzo" 1444e28f1a3d XEmacs Lucid (x86_64-unknown-linux) X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:117953 Archived-At: Karl Fogel writes: > Okay, done. My changes were a bit more extensive than I expected, > though they were not deep. Please review if you get a chance! Looks good. The only thing I question is the cite in the introduction to Bazaar's Bazaar for CVS Users. The concrete workflow presented there (ie, with actual bzr command examples) is the one Oscar recommends, but it's mixed in with a huge amount of extra stuff *plus* a whole set of workflows that simply cannot be accomplished with the concrete setup described. Cf. the comment I just added in the reference section at the end. It used to be "a brief stub". Now it's A whirlwind introduction to the features and command-line UI of Bazaar. The workflow described is very similar to that of BzrQuickStartForEmacsDevs, and the latter document may be easier to understand because it concentrates on introducing the workflow rather than the while field of distributed version control. Do you agree with that? If you do, I'll fix it to have an internal link to References (where the annotation is, and belongs) rather than a direct link to the document itself. If not, feel free to fix it or give me a word of guidance and I'll do it.