From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: =?utf-8?Q?=C3=93scar_Fuentes?= Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Failure building ctags with MinGW. Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2009 22:10:51 +0100 Message-ID: <874onorns4.fsf@telefonica.net> References: <87iqc5s6v7.fsf@telefonica.net> <87d42ds3jg.fsf@telefonica.net> <8363847jcg.fsf@gnu.org> <878wd0s3t7.fsf@telefonica.net> <83skb8577x.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1261170708 5968 80.91.229.12 (18 Dec 2009 21:11:48 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 18 Dec 2009 21:11:48 +0000 (UTC) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Dec 18 22:11:41 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1NLk6u-0002kh-PB for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 18 Dec 2009 22:11:41 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:50605 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NLk6u-00037m-KC for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 18 Dec 2009 16:11:40 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NLk6n-00036m-6G for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 18 Dec 2009 16:11:33 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NLk6i-00033T-5D for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 18 Dec 2009 16:11:32 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=36549 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NLk6i-00033O-1Q for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 18 Dec 2009 16:11:28 -0500 Original-Received: from lo.gmane.org ([80.91.229.12]:34508) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1NLk6h-0001Cp-Mp for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 18 Dec 2009 16:11:27 -0500 Original-Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.50) id 1NLk6U-0002ZS-6z for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 18 Dec 2009 22:11:14 +0100 Original-Received: from 64.red-83-34-21.dynamicip.rima-tde.net ([83.34.21.64]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 18 Dec 2009 22:11:14 +0100 Original-Received: from ofv by 64.red-83-34-21.dynamicip.rima-tde.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 18 Dec 2009 22:11:14 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-Lines: 18 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 64.red-83-34-21.dynamicip.rima-tde.net User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1.90 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:YipCXd8EBd1LZKvqYOYYfFPJftk= X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:118729 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii writes: >> The problem is that the build was configured with >> >> --cflags -Ic:/apps/gnuwin32/include --ldflags -Lc:/gnuwin32/lib >> >> (for adding graphics support.) > > I see. Why don't you just put the gnuwin32/include files into the > normal MinGW include directory? Why is it a good idea to have two > separate include trees? I prefer to keep the MinGW install pristine. OTOH, maybe using -i instead of -I for cflags is the best solution here. -- Óscar